From: "Ozan Çağlayan" <ozan@pardus.org.tr>
To: "Miller, Mike (OS Dev)" <Mike.Miller@hp.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com" <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>,
"jens.axboe@oracle.com" <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: CCISS performance drop in buffered disk reads in newer kernels
Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2009 20:21:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B1D47C5.7030804@pardus.org.tr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0F5B06BAB751E047AB5C87D1F77A778869941207A5@GVW0547EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net>
Miller, Mike (OS Dev) wrote:
> Ozan,
> I'm aware of the performance drop. Please see: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13127. I removed the huge read ahead value of 1024 that we used because users were complaining about small writes being starved. That was back around the 2.6.25 timeframe. Since that timeframe there have no changes in the main i/o path. I'll get back on this as time allows.
>
> Meanwhile, you can tweak some of the block layer tunables as such.
>
> echo 64 > /sys/block/cciss\!c0d1/queue/read_ahead_kb
> OR
> blockdev --setra 128 /dev/cciss/c0d1
>
> These are just example values. There is also max_hw_sectors_kb and max_sectors_kb that be adjusted.
>
Hi,
Actually the "#define READ_AHEAD 1024" was removed on March 2008 which
was included in the 2.6.25.y tree so 2.6.25.20 has 128kB read_ahead
value too.
*But* setting read_ahead to 2048 increases buffered disk read average
from 60~MB/s to 190~MB/s hence the kernel compile time drops to 2 minutes.
So maybe the regression/change is in another place?
The server is just a compile-farm so it's triggered by hand, compiles
distribution's packages and stays idle until the next compilation queue.
Is it safe/OK to use that 2048kB read_ahead value for such workload?
(max_hw_sectors_kb is 512 on my 2.6.25.20 setup and 1024 on 2.6.30.9 but
it seems that it's read-only)
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-07 18:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-07 10:45 CCISS performance drop in buffered disk reads in newer kernels Ozan Çağlayan
2009-12-07 16:32 ` Miller, Mike (OS Dev)
2009-12-07 18:21 ` Ozan Çağlayan [this message]
2009-12-07 18:39 ` Jens Axboe
2009-12-07 19:30 ` Miller, Mike (OS Dev)
2009-12-07 19:32 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B1D47C5.7030804@pardus.org.tr \
--to=ozan@pardus.org.tr \
--cc=Mike.Miller@hp.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox