From: Gernot Hillier <gernot@hillier.de>
To: x86@kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] [REMINDER] x86: fix warning for unsynchronized TSCs (was: avoid modifying global flag tsc_unstable in unsychronized)
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:39:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B21244C.2060006@hillier.de> (raw)
From: Gernot Hillier <gernot.hillier@siemens.com>
This is a small reminder for a patch I sent some weeks ago.
It was already confirmed by Alok (see
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/901641). I also
decided to give it a better summary. Here's the original
description from last mail:
The current behavior of unsynchronized_tsc() prevents the warning for
unsychronized TSCs to be printed: tsc_init() calls unsynchronized_tsc()
first to check for such problems; if found, mark_tsc_unstable() is
called. However, the latter bails out immediately as unsynchronized_
tsc() did already set the global flag tsc_unstable. Thus, the intended
warning message "Marking TSC unstable due to TSCs unsynchronized" won't
show up.
This patch changes the behavior for unsynchronized_tsc() to only *check*
for the quirk condition, but not to modify any global flags. If I'm not
mistaken, the only place to *set* the flag shall be mark_tsc_unstable().
Signed-off-by: Gernot Hillier <gernot.hillier@siemens.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Reviewed-by: Wolfgang Mauerer <wolfgang.mauerer@siemens.com>
Reviewed-by: Alok Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
index cd982f4..ffbb786 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
@@ -836,10 +836,10 @@ __cpuinit int unsynchronized_tsc(void)
if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_INTEL) {
/* assume multi socket systems are not synchronized: */
if (num_possible_cpus() > 1)
- tsc_unstable = 1;
+ return 1;
}
- return tsc_unstable;
+ return 0;
}
static void __init init_tsc_clocksource(void)
reply other threads:[~2009-12-10 16:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B21244C.2060006@hillier.de \
--to=gernot@hillier.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox