From: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Cc: jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org, jirislaby@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Aristeu Sergio <arozansk@redhat.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] X86: pci, fix section mismatches
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:19:22 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B26E41A.2090700@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1260388570-680-1-git-send-email-jslaby@suse.cz>
(2009/12/10 4:56), Jiri Slaby wrote:
> pcibios_scan_specific_bus calls pci_scan_bus_on_node which is __devinit.
> Mark it __devinit as well. All users are now __init or __devinit.
>
> Remark update_res from __init to __devinit as it is called also from
> __devinit functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
> Cc: Aristeu Sergio <arozansk@redhat.com>
> Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
> Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: x86@kernel.org
> ---
> arch/x86/pci/bus_numa.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/pci/legacy.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/bus_numa.c b/arch/x86/pci/bus_numa.c
> index 145df00..f939d60 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/pci/bus_numa.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/pci/bus_numa.c
> @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ void x86_pci_root_bus_res_quirks(struct pci_bus *b)
> }
> }
>
> -void __init update_res(struct pci_root_info *info, size_t start,
> +void __devinit update_res(struct pci_root_info *info, size_t start,
> size_t end, unsigned long flags, int merge)
> {
> int i;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/legacy.c b/arch/x86/pci/legacy.c
> index a8194c8..8cf7835 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/pci/legacy.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/pci/legacy.c
> @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ static int __init pci_legacy_init(void)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -void pcibios_scan_specific_bus(int busn)
> +void __devinit pcibios_scan_specific_bus(int busn)
> {
> int devfn;
> long node;
It seems that the pcibios_scan_specific_bus() is not available on
Linus's tree yet.
And according to the linux-next/master, this function is now exported
by EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(). So latter hunk is not appropriate.
I have no complain about the former hunk.
Thanks,
H.Seto
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-15 1:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-09 19:56 [PATCH 1/1] X86: pci, fix section mismatches Jiri Slaby
2009-12-15 1:19 ` Hidetoshi Seto [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B26E41A.2090700@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=arozansk@redhat.com \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox