From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko@ursulin.net>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@sophos.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Subject: Re: Are these MTRR settings correct?
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:42:11 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B26E973.6080305@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B26E4C7.8040100@gmail.com>
Robert Hancock wrote:
> On 12/14/2009 02:26 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>>> On Monday 14 Dec 2009 19:47:40 Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>>> Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>>>>> On Monday 14 Dec 2009 11:25:58 Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>>>>>>> something wrong, we should not check that with e820 or acpi
>>>>>>>> resource
>>>>>>>> in that case. please check
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> {PATCH] x86/pci: don't check mmconf again if it is from MSR with
>>>>>>>> amd
>>>>>>>> faml0h
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> for AMD Fam10h, it we read mmconf from MSR early, we should just
>>>>>>>> trust
>>>>>>>> it because we check it and correct it already.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> so skip the reject check there.
>>>>>>> [path snipped]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do you want me to test with this patch and that pci=.. option active
>>>>>>> and post dmesg? Or without the pci=... option?
>>>>>> with this patch and pci=... and post dmesg...
>>>>> Here you go:
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>>> [ 0.250041] node 0 link 0: io port [1000, ffffff]
>>>>> [ 0.250043] TOM: 00000000e0000000 aka 3584M
>>>>> [ 0.250044] Fam 10h mmconf [e0000000, efffffff]
>>>>> [ 0.250046] node 0 link 0: mmio [a0000, bffff]
>>>>> [ 0.250048] node 0 link 0: mmio [e0000000, efffffff] ==> none
>>>>> [ 0.250050] node 0 link 0: mmio [f0000000, fe7fffff]
>>>>> [ 0.250051] node 0 link 0: mmio [fe800000, fe9fffff]
>>>>> [ 0.250053] node 0 link 0: mmio [fea00000, ffefffff]
>>>>> [ 0.250054] TOM2: 0000000120000000 aka 4608M
>>>>> [ 0.250056] bus: [00,07] on node 0 link 0
>>>>> [ 0.250057] bus: 00 index 0 io port: [0, ffff]
>>>>> [ 0.250058] bus: 00 index 1 mmio: [a0000, bffff]
>>>>> [ 0.250060] bus: 00 index 2 mmio: [f0000000, ffffffff]
>>>>> [ 0.250061] bus: 00 index 3 mmio: [120000000, fcffffffff]
>>>>> [ 0.250068] ACPI: bus type pci registered
>>>>> [ 0.250091] PCI: Found AMD Family 10h NB with MMCONFIG support.
>>>>> [ 0.254793] PCI: Using MMCONFIG at e0000000 - efffffff
>>>>> [ 0.254795] PCI: Using configuration type 1 for base access
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> thanks, mmconf works on your system.
>>>
>>> So I should keep using both your patch and
>>> pci=check_enable_amd_mmconf option?
>>>
>>
>> I will push the driver to Jesse.
>>
>> but you need to have pci=check_enable_amd_mmconf, unless we add one
>> DMI entry for your kind of system.
>
> Something else isn't quite right. It looks like MMCONFIG area should be
> reserved:
>
> [ 0.308434] system 00:0c: iomem range 0xe0000000-0xefffffff has been
> reserved
>
> but the code didn't seem to detect that. In fact there doesn't seem to
> be any output about whether it was or wasn't reserved, which from the
> code it seems there should be.
>
> Maybe because of that ACPI method execution error?
>
could be sth pnpacpi brokenness?
YH
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-15 1:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-13 8:07 Are there MTRR settings correct? Tvrtko Ursulin
2009-12-13 8:26 ` Are these " Tvrtko Ursulin
2009-12-13 9:25 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-12-13 17:19 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2009-12-13 22:56 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-12-14 11:19 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2009-12-14 11:25 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-12-14 19:34 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2009-12-14 19:47 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-12-14 20:16 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2009-12-14 20:26 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-12-15 1:22 ` Robert Hancock
2009-12-15 1:42 ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2009-12-15 16:55 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2009-12-15 18:01 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-12-15 20:50 ` Robert Hancock
2009-12-15 21:09 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-12-16 0:14 ` Robert Hancock
2009-12-16 6:26 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-12-15 2:47 ` [PATCH] x86/pci: don't check mmconf again if it is from MSR with amd faml0h Yinghai Lu
2009-12-16 20:06 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-12-16 22:18 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-12-13 20:26 ` Are these MTRR settings correct? Robert Hancock
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B26E973.6080305@kernel.org \
--to=yinghai@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
--cc=hancockrwd@gmail.com \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@sophos.com \
--cc=tvrtko@ursulin.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox