public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, rdreier@cisco.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: bisected crash due to "x86: Move swiotlb initialization before dma32_free_bootmem"
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 03:25:41 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B277235.4010308@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091215201039V.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>

FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 11:56:50 +0100
> Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> 
>> * FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>>
>>> There are a few people who hit this. How many people use a box with over 
>>> 256GB memory?
>>>
>>> And you can work around this with "dma32_size" kernel boot option.
>> Well, since the kernel has not crashed before this change there's really just 
>> two options as per upstream kernel regression policy: either we fix it or we 
>> revert it.
> 
> As I wrote, here is a patch that can be applied to cleanly to the git
> head:
> 
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/tomo/misc/0001-x86-two-stage-swiotlb-initialization.patch
> 
> It fixes the problem. Yinghai, can you test it? It should work but
> it's good to confirm it.

i tested already, it works.

> 
> I simply wanted to say that it's not a bug that breaks lots of boxes
> or leads to something serious like data corruption (no need to say
> something like "revert it now!"). It's also worth investigating why it
> breaks, I think.

will look at it later

YH


  reply	other threads:[~2009-12-15 11:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-15  7:47 bisected crash due to "x86: Move swiotlb initialization before dma32_free_bootmem" Roland Dreier
2009-12-15  8:55 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-12-15  9:04   ` Yinghai Lu
2009-12-15  9:23     ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-12-15  9:11   ` Yinghai Lu
2009-12-15  9:23     ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-12-15 10:56       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-15 11:10         ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-12-15 11:25           ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2009-12-15 11:43             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-15 11:50             ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-12-15 13:04             ` Yinghai Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B277235.4010308@kernel.org \
    --to=yinghai@kernel.org \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox