From: Sachin Sant <sachinp@in.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Linux/PPC Development <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Next] CPU Hotplug test failures on powerpc
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 19:17:28 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B279370.5050800@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1260873827.4165.362.camel@twins>
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> I added some debug statements within the above code.
>> This is a 2 cpu machine.
>>
>> XMON dest_cpu = 1024 . dead_cpu = 1 . nr_cpu_ids = 2
>> XMON dest_cpu = 1024
>> XMON dest_cpu = 1024 . dead_cpu = 1
>> XMON dest_cpu = 1024 . dead_cpu = 1 . nr_cpu_ids = 2
>> XMON dest_cpu = 1024
>> XMON dest_cpu = 1024 . dead_cpu = 1
>> XMON dest_cpu = 1024 . dead_cpu = 1 . nr_cpu_ids = 2
>> XMON dest_cpu = 1024
>> XMON dest_cpu = 1024 . dead_cpu = 1
>>
>> Seems to me that the control is stuck in an infinite loop and hence the
>> machine appears to be in hung state. The dest_cpu value is always 1024
>> and never changes, which result in an infinite loop.
>>
>> In working scenario the o/p is something on the following lines
>>
>> XMON dest_cpu = 1024 . dead_cpu = 1 . nr_cpu_ids = 2
>> XMON dest_cpu = 0
>> XMON dest_cpu = 1024 . dead_cpu = 1 . nr_cpu_ids = 2
>> XMON dest_cpu = 0
>> XMON dest_cpu = 1024 . dead_cpu = 1 . nr_cpu_ids = 2
>> XMON dest_cpu = 0
>>
>> Let me know if i should try to record any specific value ?
>>
>
> Could you possibly print the two masks themselves? cpumask_scnprintf()
> and friend come in handy for this.
>
> The dest_cpu=1024 thing seem to suggest the intersection between
> p->cpus_allowed and cpu_active_mask is empty for some reason, even
> though we forcefully reset p->cpus_allowed to the full set using
> cpuset_cpus_allowed_locked().
>
So here is the data related to the two masks.
cpu_active_mask = 00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,
00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,
00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,
00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,
00000000,00000000
XMON dest_cpu = 1024
while p->cpus_allowed = 00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,
00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,
00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,
00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,
00000000,00000000,00000001
XMON dest_cpu = 1024
In working scenario the above data looks like
cpu_active_mask = 00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,
00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,
00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,
00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,
00000000,00000002
XMON dest_cpu = 1
while p->cpus_allowed = 00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,
00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,
00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,
00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,
00000000,00000000,00000002
XMON dest_cpu = 1
hope i got the data correct.
Thanks
-Sachin
--
---------------------------------
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
---------------------------------
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-15 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-11 10:53 [Next] CPU Hotplug test failures on powerpc Sachin Sant
2009-12-14 2:48 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-12-14 4:37 ` Sachin Sant
2009-12-14 10:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-14 11:11 ` Sachin Sant
2009-12-14 12:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-14 21:17 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-12-15 9:44 ` Sachin Sant
2009-12-15 10:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-15 13:47 ` Sachin Sant [this message]
2009-12-15 15:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16 5:38 ` Sachin Sant
2009-12-16 7:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16 6:56 ` Xiaotian Feng
2009-12-16 6:25 ` Xiaotian Feng
2009-12-16 6:41 ` Sachin Sant
2009-12-16 6:45 ` Xiaotian Feng
2009-12-16 6:54 ` Sachin Sant
2009-12-16 7:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16 7:57 ` Xiaotian Feng
2009-12-16 8:24 ` Sachin Sant
2009-12-16 9:07 ` Xiaotian Feng
2009-12-16 9:15 ` [PATCH] fix cpu hotplug " Xiaotian Feng
2009-12-16 10:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B279370.5050800@in.ibm.com \
--to=sachinp@in.ibm.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox