From: Justin Madru <jdm64@gawab.com>
To: Ray Lee <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>
Cc: gregkh@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: s5k3e2fx.c: reduce complexity by factoring
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:37:10 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B27D756.4050102@gawab.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2c0942db0912142002p638a187araa837812862e5b17@mail.gmail.com>
On 12/14/2009 08:02 PM, Ray Lee wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Justin Madru<jdm64@gawab.com> wrote:
>
>> I was style fixing some code when I ran into this code.
>> It seems like the code could be reduced, by factoring the expression.
>> But this results in a very simple expression.
>>
>> Am I assuming something wrong? Or is this a bug in the original code?
>> This doesn't look right because the assignment of s_move[i] has no mention
>> of the loop counter.
>>
> Algebraic factoring is not valid in general when dealing with pure
> integer expressions that may contain rounding issues. I haven't
> checked to see if that's the case with the code you're changing, but
> that sort of expression you're removing is very commonly used exactly
> to deal with rounding issues.
>
I know that's true and that's why I was questioning if my patch actually
removed a necessary calculation.
But, wouldn't you agree that if the code was suppose to deal with
"rounding issues" that there's a
simpler expression?
Justin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-15 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-06 2:03 [PATCH] staging: s5k3e2fx.c: reduce complexity by factoring Justin Madru
2009-12-09 9:57 ` Dan Carpenter
2009-12-15 0:38 ` Justin Madru
2009-12-15 0:47 ` Greg KH
2009-12-15 4:02 ` Ray Lee
2009-12-15 18:37 ` Justin Madru [this message]
2009-12-15 19:10 ` Ray Lee
2009-12-15 20:57 ` Justin Madru
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B27D756.4050102@gawab.com \
--to=jdm64@gawab.com \
--cc=error27@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ray-lk@madrabbit.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox