From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763114AbZLPWWt (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Dec 2009 17:22:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1763095AbZLPWWp (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Dec 2009 17:22:45 -0500 Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:59450 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1763072AbZLPWWl (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Dec 2009 17:22:41 -0500 Message-ID: <4B295D70.6000109@kernel.org> Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:21:36 -0800 From: Yinghai Lu User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alex Chiang CC: Jesse Barnes , Kenji Kaneshige , "Eric W. Biederman" , Bjorn Helgaas , Ingo Molnar , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , Ivan Kokshaysky , torvalds@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] pci: update pci bridge resource to get more big range for devices under it - v13 References: <4AFCFC0D.4030002@kernel.org> <4AFD19DA.7010602@jp.fujitsu.com> <4AFE6F39.5080505@kernel.org> <4B0B321E.4010103@jp.fujitsu.com> <4B0B335E.1070809@kernel.org> <4B0B3C13.9030502@jp.fujit!su.com> <4B0C69AD.3030106@kernel.org> <4B0D13EB.9010403@jp.fujitsu.com> <4B10D286.4020607@kernel.org> <20091216125458.42bf222e@jbarnes-piketon> <20091216211158.GF26757@ldl.fc.hp.com> In-Reply-To: <20091216211158.GF26757@ldl.fc.hp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alex Chiang wrote: > Hi Yinghai, > > * Jesse Barnes : >>> -v13: change resource_list to resource_list_x, to save size and flags >>> aside, otherwise grandchild res will get confused with son's res as >>> could be used > > One difficulty that I have in reviewing is the multiple patch > revisions buried deep within a thread. > > Blame my small brain for not being able to keep track of all > the revision-as-mail-responses in one coherent body of work. > >> Patches 4-6 make me the most nervous, since they have the potential of >> really changing our resource allocation (hopefully for the better) on >> many platforms. >> >> Linus, can you check them out and see if you're ok with the direction? >> >> Patches 7-9 seem like they've recieved some review from Alex and >> Kenji-san, but I don't see acks or reviewed-bys on them. >> >> Alex and Kenji-san, are you ok with them assuming the previous patches >> or something like them go upstream? > > Can you please repost your next revision (after taking Jesse's > review comments) in a new thread? ok. YH