From: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@gmail.com>,
linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cfq: Remove useless css reference get
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 13:57:08 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B29C834.8090407@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091216163941.GA2807@redhat.com>
于 2009年12月17日 00:39, Vivek Goyal 写道:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 04:38:43PM +0800, Gui Jianfeng wrote:
>> There's no need to take css reference here, for the caller
>> has already called rcu_read_lock() to prevent cgroup from
>> being removed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
>
> Hi Gui,
>
> How would an rcu lock protect against the possibility that blkiocg_destroy()
> has not already been called on another cpu? rcu lock will make sure that
> cgroup and blkio_cgroup object should still be around as long as I am
> holding rcu lock but will not protect against deletion path being executed
> on another cpu? So I don't want to end up in following situation.
>
> cpu1 cpu2
>
> rcu_read_lock()
> blkiocg_destroy()
>
> blkiocg_add_blkio_group()
> rcu_read_unlock()
>
> I don't want to add blkg object on a potentially dead blkio_cgroup object
> which will go away. Does this protection is provided by generic cgroup
> code where blkiocg_destroy() will not be called if I have got cgroup
> pointer under rcu lock?
>
> Currently we are deriving cgroup information from task context so task is
> still inside cgroup, so cgroup can't be deleted anyway. What if I was
> deriving cgroup information from bio, will taking css object reference be
> necessary in that case or just cgroup pointer under rcu lock is sufficient
> to preclude the race against cgroup deletion path?
>
We pass a cgroup ptr to cfq_find_alloc_cfqg(), which means the cgroup is
valid. As long as it's safe to access the cgroup, it's safe to access the
corresponding blkio_cgroup.
But if you still want blkio_cgroup to be valid after dropping rcu_read_lock
(or cgroup_mutex), you need to call css_get() first. Note you don't need
to call css_tryget(). css_tryget() is only needed in mem_cgroup, because
mem_cgroup is a bit special, in that a mem_cgroup can remain valid after
a cgroup is destroyed.
If a user tries to rmdir a cgroup when its css refcnt > 0, EBUSY will be
returned.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-17 5:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-16 8:38 [PATCH] cfq: Remove useless css reference get Gui Jianfeng
2009-12-16 11:09 ` Corrado Zoccolo
2009-12-16 13:13 ` Jens Axboe
2009-12-16 16:39 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-12-16 18:38 ` Jens Axboe
2009-12-16 19:40 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-12-17 5:57 ` Li Zefan [this message]
2009-12-18 15:08 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-12-21 16:28 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-02-26 5:21 ` Gui Jianfeng
2010-02-26 7:56 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B29C834.8090407@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=czoccolo@gmail.com \
--cc=guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox