From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu,
linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86: Fix objdump version check in arch/x86/tools/chkobjdump.awk
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 19:18:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B2ACA46.90707@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B2AC7C0.6040801@zytor.com>
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 12/17/2009 04:04 PM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>>>
>>> Warning: objdump version is older than 2.19
>>> Warning: Skipping posttest.
>>>
>>> because it used the wrong field from `objdump -v':
>>>
>>> akpm:/usr/src/25> /opt/crosstool/gcc-4.0.2-glibc-2.3.6/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-objdump -v
>>> GNU objdump 2.16.1
>>> Copyright 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>>> This program is free software; you may redistribute it under the terms of
>>> the GNU General Public License. This program has absolutely no warranty.
>>
>>
>> Oh, I didn't know that.
>> On my environment, objdump shows version in below format.
>> ---
>> $ objdump -v
>> GNU objdump version 2.19.51.0.14-1.fc11 20090722
>> Copyright 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>> This program is free software; you may redistribute it under the terms of
>> the GNU General Public License version 3 or (at your option) any later version.
>> This program has absolutely no warranty.
>> ---
>>
>> Hmm, maybe, we need to check if ($3 == "version") to decide
>> which argument we should use.
>>
>
> How about looking for the first argument that starts with a number?
Sure, that's also possible. :-)
Thank you,
--
Masami Hiramatsu
Software Engineer
Hitachi Computer Products (America), Inc.
Software Solutions Division
e-mail: mhiramat@redhat.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-18 0:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200912172326.nBHNQaQl024796@imap1.linux-foundation.org>
2009-12-17 23:57 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86: Fix objdump version check in arch/x86/tools/chkobjdump.awk tip-bot for akpm@linux-foundation.org
2009-12-18 0:04 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-12-18 0:07 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-12-18 0:18 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2009-12-18 0:25 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-12-18 15:34 ` [PATCH x86/urgent] x86: Fix objdump version check in chkobjdump.awk for different formats Masami Hiramatsu
2009-12-18 15:32 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-12-18 15:40 ` [PATCH x86/urgent v2] " Masami Hiramatsu
2009-12-18 18:06 ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Masami Hiramatsu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B2ACA46.90707@redhat.com \
--to=mhiramat@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox