Re: audit.c skb - tty race condition - was sky2 panic in 2.6.32.1 under load (new oops)

[Michael Breuer <mbreuer@majjas.com>]

And now looking at audit.c it seems reasonable that there is a race 
condition when auditd is started at roughly the same time as X. I'm 
guessing that the kaudit thread is fired up; the tty connected; and at 
the same time X grabs the tty. Somewhere in there an skb gets hosed and 
is then reused by whatever comes along - in my case sky2 as that's where 
the subsequent demand is. If the demand happens first, the contaminated 
skb (dk in what way yet) is probably waiting to manifest as some other 
bug that's been frustrating people.
On 12/30/2009 12:49 PM, Michael Breuer wrote:
> On 12/30/2009 2:58 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>> On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 02:23:20 -0500
>> Michael Breuer<mbreuer@majjas.com>  wrote:
>>
>>> Ok - I called dump_txring from sky2_net_intr:
>>> --- a/drivers/net/sky2.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/sky2.c
>>> @@ -2725,8 +2791,10 @@ static void sky2_watchdog(unsigned long arg)
>>>    /* Hardware/software error handling */
>>>    static void sky2_err_intr(struct sky2_hw *hw, u32 status)
>>>    {
>>> -       if (net_ratelimit())
>>> +       if (net_ratelimit()) {
>>>                   dev_warn(&hw->pdev->dev, "error interrupt
>>> status=%#x\n", status);
>>> +               dump_txring(hw, 0);
>>> +       }
>>>
>>>           if (status&  Y2_IS_HW_ERR)
>>>                   sky2_hw_intr(hw);
>>>
>>> And got this:
>>> Dec 30 02:17:23 mail kernel: sky2 0000:06:00.0: error interrupt
>>> status=0x40000008
>>> Dec 30 02:17:23 mail kernel: sky2 0000:06:00.0: error interrupt
>>> status=0x40000008
>>> Dec 30 02:17:23 mail kernel: sky2 Tx ring pending=28...30 report=29 
>>> done=29
>>> Dec 30 02:17:23 mail kernel: sky2 Tx ring pending=28...30 report=29 
>>> done=29
>>> Dec 30 02:17:23 mail kernel: sky2 0000:06:00.0: error interrupt 
>>> status=0x8
>>> Dec 30 02:17:23 mail kernel: sky2 0000:06:00.0: error interrupt 
>>> status=0x8
>>> Dec 30 02:17:23 mail kernel: sky2 Tx ring pending=30...32 report=30 
>>> done=31
>>> Dec 30 02:17:23 mail kernel: sky2 Tx ring pending=30...32 report=30 
>>> done=31
>>>
>> I notice that you have NOUVEAU Nvidia drivers loaded? The one 
>> difference in HW
>> between your board and mine is that I have ATI video card.
>>
> Seems the problem is linked to auditd and X11 (but not nouveau).
>
> Today, I ran a bunch of scenarios. I first determined that the problem 
> only manifest in runlevel 5. Next, this occurred with or without KMS 
> and with or without nouveau. This happened whether or not I was logged 
> in (local or remote), and regardless of window manager (xdm, gdm, 
> kdm). I then checked to see what else was different between runlevel 3 
> and 5 - only thing was auditd. I disabled auditd and reran - no errors.
>
> Now for the odd stuff:
>
> The errors only manifest if the high throughput data transfer is 
> initiated when the system is in runlevel 5 and auditd was started by 
> init when transitioning from runlevel 3 to 5. For example, the 
> following scenarios do not cause the errors to manifest:
>
> runlevel3; start auditd runlevel 5; start transfer
> runlevel3; chkconfig auditd off; runlevel5; start auditd; start transfer
> runlevel3; start transfer (note: errors do not occur if I transition 
> to runlevel 5 after the high bandwidth transfer has started)
> runlevel3; startx; start transfer
>
> The only way I get the problem to manifest is transition to runlevel 5 
> with chkconfig auditd on (level 5 only) and then initate the windows 
> backup.
>
> I'm guessing that there is some sort of race condition happening 
> between X (xdm/gdm/kdm/greeter?) and auditd that is somehow corrupting 
> something. I'd hazard a more or less obvious guess that whatever's 
> being corrupted differs when there is already a high throughput 
> transfer under way.
>
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe 
> linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/