From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753603AbZL3Utp (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Dec 2009 15:49:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753439AbZL3Utp (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Dec 2009 15:49:45 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:5233 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753381AbZL3Uto (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Dec 2009 15:49:44 -0500 Message-ID: <4B3BBCDC.5010806@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 22:49:32 +0200 From: Avi Kivity User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091209 Fedora/3.0-4.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linus Torvalds CC: Yuhong Bao , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Happy birthday Linus! References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/30/2009 10:27 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Yes, I did. In fact, I bought one purely for Linux development, so that I > could test the code to do i387 error handling (which is non-trivial, > because an IBM PC/AT hooks up the i387 in a non-standard way - not the way > Intel designed it directly to the CPU, but instead through the interrupt > controller) > Or rather, Intel designed it in a non-standard way, different from the way IBM implemented it later. -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain.