public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	open-osd <osd-dev@open-osd.org>,
	Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>,
	Stable Tree <stable@kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [osd-dev] [PATCH] scsi_lib: Bug in completion of bidi commands
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2010 09:26:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B41981A.6080204@panasas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1001031149380.29885-100000@netrider.rowland.org>

On 01/03/2010 06:55 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Jan 2010, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> 
>>> What patch of mine are you referring to?  So far James has rejected all
>>> the patches I have submitted recently.  I'm going to try again in the 
>>> near future...
>>>
>>
>> OK, that's my answer, I didn't know.
>>
>> Would you want that I attempt that collapsing of scsi_end_request() into scsi_io_completion
>> and the cleanup that implies? (that's the patch I meant.)
> 
> Okay, I don't mind if you would like to rewrite that patch.  The 
> version I wrote didn't just move code from one subroutine to another; 
> it also made a few semantic changes (the retry counter and the "error" 
> argument to blk_end_request()).  You'll probably want to break it 
> up into a few patches, where the first simply moves the code around and 
> the later ones do more significant things.
> 

Hi Alan, thanks

I'll only do the former and I'll let you continue with the later. .I.E the
code rearrangement and cleanup. Then perhaps it would be easier for you to
enhance the code with the retries and error returns. I do not have the setup
that can test / demonstrate those fixes, I'd rather you did them.

> As I recall, the most recent version of that patch is here:
> 
> 	http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=123991011815404&w=2
> 

Thanks

> Alan Stern
> 

Boaz

  reply	other threads:[~2010-01-04  7:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <4B27AA77.3040002@panasas.com>
2009-12-31  7:53 ` [osd-dev] [PATCH] scsi_lib: Bug in completion of bidi commands Boaz Harrosh
2010-01-01  2:46   ` Alan Stern
2010-01-03 10:11     ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-01-03 16:55       ` Alan Stern
2010-01-04  7:26         ` Boaz Harrosh [this message]
2010-01-12 11:16 ` Boaz Harrosh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B41981A.6080204@panasas.com \
    --to=bharrosh@panasas.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@suse.de \
    --cc=bhalevy@panasas.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=osd-dev@open-osd.org \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox