From: Xiaotian Feng <dfeng@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Magnus Damm <damm@igel.co.jp>,
H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clockevent: don't remove broadcast device when cpu is dead
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 19:43:50 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B4F0376.3090906@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1001132305280.6420@localhost.localdomain>
On 01/14/2010 06:08 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jan 2010, Xiaotian Feng wrote:
>> On 01/12/2010 09:20 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> On Thu, 7 Jan 2010, Xiaotian Feng wrote:
>>>
>>>> Marc reported BUG during shutdown, after debugging, kernel is trying
>>>> to remove a broadcast device which mode is CLOCK_EVT_MODE_ONESHOT.
>>>>
>>>> The root cause for this bug is that in clockevents_notify,
>>>> "cpumask_weight(dev->cpumask) == 1" is always true even if dev is a
>>>
>>> Why is cpumask_weight(dev->cpumask) == 1 always true when we shutdown
>>> a non boot cpu ?
>>>
>>> The broadcast device is not a per cpu device and the cpumask should
>>> not only contain the CPU which is shut down !
>>
>> At least for hpet broadcast dev, it's dev->cpumask is only contain the CPU
>> which it is initialized from.
>
> Which is fundamentaly wrong and the root cause of the problem. I'll
> have a look tomorrow morning when my brain is more awake than now.
hpet_legacy_clockevent_register is trying to register new CE, but
replace failed,
then in tick_check_new_device -> tick_check_broadcast_device, the legacy
hpet CE
was registered as multicast device, but its dev->cpumask is cpumask of
smp_processor_id().
on my system its dev->cpumask is cpumask of 0, but in Marc's,
dev->cpumask is cpumask of 4.
So when kernel is trying to offline cpu 4, the broadcast hpet is removed.
>
>> And for broadcast device, kernel is using tick_broadcast_mask not
>> dev->cpumask, right?
>
> No, tick_broadcast_mask is the bitmask which tells us which cpus get
> the broadcast IPI.
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-14 11:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-07 3:22 [PATCH] clockevent: don't remove broadcast device when cpu is dead Xiaotian Feng
2010-01-12 2:24 ` Xiaotian Feng
2010-01-12 13:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-01-13 1:28 ` Marc Dionne
2010-01-13 1:48 ` Xiaotian Feng
2010-01-13 22:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-01-14 11:43 ` Xiaotian Feng [this message]
2010-01-14 11:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-01-18 13:48 ` [tip:timers/urgent] clockevent: Don't " tip-bot for Xiaotian Feng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B4F0376.3090906@redhat.com \
--to=dfeng@redhat.com \
--cc=damm@igel.co.jp \
--cc=hsweeten@visionengravers.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox