From: Michael Breuer <mbreuer@majjas.com>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, flyboy@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] af_packet: Don't use skb after dev_queue_xmit()
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:56:45 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B54CB0D.5070604@majjas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100118204658.GC3157@del.dom.local>
On 1/18/2010 3:46 PM, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 11:29:31AM -0500, Michael Breuer wrote:
>
>> Ok - up on the two patches, no DMAR. Some early observations:
>>
>> 1. There's an early on MMAP oops (see below). This happens once, at
>> the completion of the transition to runlevel 5 (I've seen it
>> entering runlevel 3 as well). This does not recur when runlevels are
>> subsequently changed. I do not see this when running with DMAR
>> enabled.
>>
> OK, you mentioned this oops (actually a warning only) happened during
> previous tests too.
>
Yes - dk if it's significant or not. Only obvious difference between
DMAR and not.
>
>> 2. The dropped tx packet (DHCP) is a bit harder to recreate, but it
>> still happens.
>>
> Btw, I guess you improved the test because you didn't mention it here,
> even after my explicit question?:
> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/149171
>
I had been focusing on the hangs - dhcp causing the initial crash from
December. After things stabilized with the af patch & skb may pull I
started noticing the dropped tx packets. I reported the TX loss on the
16th of January after confirming the issue.
>
>> Interestingly, I initially saw no dropped packets
>> with ping - but after I went the DCHP route and eventually
>> reconnected, I could then cause dropped tx packets with ping. To
>> clarify:
>>
>> a) start throughput
>> b) ping device - no packet loss - this was true for the entire test run.
>> c) start throughput again
>> d) ping - no loss.
>> e) drop wifi on the device& restart - first attempt worked. Repeat
>> attempt yielded the dropped DHCPOFFER packets. After about 6 tries,
>> the device reconnected to wifi.
>> f) ping again (after the reconnection) - packet loss rate about 80%.
>> g) simultaneously ping the wifi router - no loss.
>> h) After a while, packets are no longer dropped during ping. If I
>> manage to cause the dhcp drop again, and then ping after the device
>> finally reconnects, packet loss is significant for a while (maybe 30
>> sec to a minute). Then things return to normal. Note that the packet
>> loss continues even if the reported throughput drops to nil.
>> i) I can't cause the initial packet loss at RX rates below about
>> 30,000KBPS (as reported by nethogs). At rates over 40 I can
>> reproduce this on this set of patches& config about 60% of the
>> time.
>>
> I forgot to mention, but did you try to check if these lost ping
> packets are "being dropped somewhere after wireshark sees them and
> before hitting the wire" like DHCPOFFER? Aren't there any sky2
> warnings/resets while this happens?
>
> Jarek P.
>
Yes. There are no errors, and no statistics anywhere that I know to look
reflect the loss. Nothing in netstat; ethtool -S; etc. The only loss
reported is RX. The recent TX warnings/resets happened while the machine
was up for several days and while unattended and under high RX load.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-18 20:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 145+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-21 23:52 sky2 panic in 2.6.32.1 under load Berck E. Nash
2009-12-22 0:09 ` Michael Breuer
2009-12-22 18:50 ` Michael Breuer
2009-12-23 22:54 ` sky2 panic in 2.6.32.1 under load (new oops) Michael Breuer
2009-12-24 7:01 ` Andrew Morton
2009-12-24 19:18 ` Michael Breuer
2009-12-24 22:27 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-12-25 16:28 ` Michael Breuer
2009-12-25 23:22 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-12-26 3:23 ` Michael Breuer
2009-12-26 17:57 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-12-26 20:37 ` Michael Breuer
2009-12-26 22:05 ` [PATCH] sky2: make sure ethernet header is in transmit skb Stephen Hemminger
2009-12-27 3:44 ` David Miller
2009-12-27 4:11 ` David Miller
2010-01-04 5:32 ` David Miller
2010-01-04 16:40 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-01-04 17:02 ` Michael Breuer
2010-01-05 23:07 ` [PATCH] af_packet: Don't use skb after dev_queue_xmit() Jarek Poplawski
2010-01-05 23:16 ` Michael Breuer
2010-01-05 23:29 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-01-06 2:36 ` Michael Breuer
2010-01-06 7:22 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-01-06 9:15 ` [PATCH alt.2] " Jarek Poplawski
2010-01-06 14:49 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-01-06 19:40 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-01-06 19:49 ` [PATCH] " Michael Breuer
2010-01-06 20:22 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-01-06 20:33 ` Michael Breuer
2010-01-06 21:09 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-01-06 21:32 ` Michael Breuer
2010-01-06 21:10 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-01-06 21:20 ` Michael Breuer
2010-01-06 23:26 ` Michael Breuer
2010-01-07 2:42 ` Michael Breuer
2010-01-07 4:00 ` Michael Breuer
2010-01-07 4:53 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-01-07 5:10 ` Michael Breuer
2010-01-07 5:32 ` Michael Breuer
2010-01-07 5:54 ` Michael Breuer
2010-01-07 7:20 ` Michael Breuer
2010-01-07 7:47 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-01-07 7:55 ` Michael Breuer
2010-01-07 8:21 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-01-07 15:03 ` Michael Breuer
2010-01-07 17:56 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-01-07 18:17 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-01-07 15:05 ` Michael Breuer
2010-01-07 18:01 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-01-07 18:19 ` Michael Breuer
2010-01-07 18:35 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-01-07 18:40 ` Michael Breuer
2010-01-07 18:43 ` Michael Breuer
2010-01-07 18:50 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-01-07 19:36 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-01-07 19:55 ` Michael Breuer
2010-01-07 20:22 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-01-07 23:11 ` Michael Breuer
2010-01-08 7:45 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-01-08 16:40 ` Michael Breuer
2010-01-08 21:29 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-01-08 21:48 ` Michael Breuer
2010-01-08 22:02 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-01-09 4:45 ` Michael Breuer
2010-01-09 5:44 ` Michael Breuer
2010-01-09 12:28 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-01-09 18:34 ` Michael Breuer
2010-01-13 20:39 ` Michael Breuer
2010-01-13 21:09 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-01-13 21:16 ` Michael Breuer
2010-01-13 21:34 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-01-17 16:26 ` Michael Breuer
2010-01-17 22:17 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-01-17 22:34 ` Michael Breuer
2010-01-17 23:05 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-01-17 23:15 ` Michael Breuer
2010-01-18 7:30 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-01-18 16:29 ` Michael Breuer
2010-01-18 20:46 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-01-18 20:56 ` Michael Breuer [this message]
2010-01-18 21:00 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-01-18 21:06 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-01-18 21:24 ` Michael Breuer
2010-01-18 21:50 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-01-18 21:25 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-01-18 21:39 ` Michael Breuer
2010-01-18 22:08 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-01-18 22:17 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-01-18 22:47 ` Michael Breuer
2010-01-19 5:46 ` Michael Breuer
2010-01-19 8:41 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-01-19 15:28 ` Michael Breuer
2010-01-21 19:48 ` Michael Breuer
2010-01-19 10:47 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-01-19 15:47 ` Michael Breuer
2010-01-19 19:59 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-01-19 20:06 ` Michael Breuer
2010-01-19 20:29 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-01-19 22:45 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-01-20 1:01 ` Michael Breuer
2010-01-20 1:10 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-01-21 16:14 ` Stefan Richter
2010-01-21 16:50 ` Stefan Richter
2010-01-18 22:25 ` Michael Breuer
2010-01-18 22:40 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-12-27 17:03 ` sky2 panic in 2.6.32.1 under load (new oops) Michael Breuer
2009-12-27 18:22 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-12-27 19:39 ` Michael Breuer
2009-12-29 17:30 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-12-29 17:39 ` Michael Breuer
2009-12-29 18:38 ` Michael Breuer
2009-12-29 18:54 ` Michael Breuer
2009-12-29 19:49 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-12-29 20:41 ` Michael Breuer
2009-12-30 7:23 ` Michael Breuer
2009-12-30 7:58 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-12-30 17:49 ` Michael Breuer
2009-12-30 19:15 ` audit.c skb - tty race condition - was " Michael Breuer
2009-12-30 20:44 ` Michael Breuer
2009-12-30 21:15 ` Michael Breuer
2009-12-30 21:21 ` Michael Breuer
2009-12-30 7:59 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-12-30 15:40 ` Michael Breuer
2009-12-30 18:10 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-12-30 18:37 ` Michael Breuer
2009-12-31 18:09 ` Michael Breuer
2009-12-31 18:24 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-01-01 17:42 ` Michael Breuer
2010-01-01 19:26 ` sky2 panic in 2.6.32.1 under load (tty NULL write) Michael Breuer
2010-01-01 20:34 ` Michael Breuer
2010-01-02 21:42 ` Michael Breuer
2009-12-29 19:15 ` sky2 panic in 2.6.32.1 under load (new oops) Jarek Poplawski
2009-12-29 19:20 ` Michael Breuer
2009-12-30 8:07 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-12-30 15:36 ` Michael Breuer
2009-12-22 0:52 ` sky2 panic in 2.6.32.1 under load Daniel Hazelton
2009-12-24 6:58 ` Andrew Morton
2009-12-24 16:03 ` Berck Nash
2009-12-24 16:28 ` Daniel Hazelton
2009-12-24 22:21 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-12-24 22:42 ` Michael Breuer
2009-12-25 0:06 ` Daniel Hazelton
2009-12-24 16:10 ` Michael Breuer
2009-12-24 16:16 ` Berck Nash
2009-12-24 16:26 ` Michael Breuer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B54CB0D.5070604@majjas.com \
--to=mbreuer@majjas.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=flyboy@gmail.com \
--cc=jarkao2@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox