public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
	Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] pci: add pci_bridge_release_unused_res and	pci_bus_release_unused_bridge_res
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:11:10 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B562DFE.7020006@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100119212608.GF11010@ldl.fc.hp.com>

On 01/19/2010 01:26 PM, Alex Chiang wrote:
>> +static void __ref pci_bus_release_bridge_resources(struct pci_bus *bus,
>> +						   unsigned long type,
>> +						   enum release_type rel_type)
>> +{
>> +	struct pci_dev *dev;
>> +	bool is_leaf_bridge = true;
>> +
>> +	list_for_each_entry(dev, &bus->devices, bus_list) {
>> +		struct pci_bus *b = dev->subordinate;
>> +		if (!b)
>> +			continue;
>> +
>> +		switch (dev->class >> 8) {
>> +		case PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_CARDBUS:
>> +			is_leaf_bridge = false;
>> +			break;
>> +
>> +		case PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI:
>> +		default:
>> +			is_leaf_bridge = false;
>> +			if (rel_type == whole_subtree)
>> +				pci_bus_release_bridge_resources(b, type,
>> +							 whole_subtree);
>> +			break;
>> +		}
>> +	}
> 
> I still don't understand this loop. Can't you write it like this:
> 
> 	list_for_each_entry(dev, &bus->devices, bus_list) {
> 		struct pci_bus *b = dev->subordinate;
> 		if (!b)
> 			continue;
> 
> 		is_leaf_bridge = false;
> 
> 		if ((dev->class >> 8) == PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_CARDBUS)
> 			continue;
> 
> 		if (rel_type == whole_subtree)
> 			pci_bus_release_bridge_resources(b, type,
> 						whole_subtree);
> 	}
> 
> I'm looking at that 'default' label in your switch() statement
> which causes us to always set is_leaf_bridge = false after 'b' is
> valid.

ok

  reply	other threads:[~2010-01-19 22:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-16 11:07 [PATCH 00/11] pci: update pci bridge resources Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 11:07 ` [PATCH 01/11] pci: add pci_bridge_release_unused_res and pci_bus_release_unused_bridge_res Yinghai Lu
2010-01-19 21:26   ` Alex Chiang
2010-01-19 22:11     ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2010-01-16 11:07 ` [PATCH 02/11] pci: add failed_list to record failed one for pci_bus_assign_resources Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 11:07 ` [PATCH 03/11] pci: reject mmio range start from 0 on pci_bridge read Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 11:07 ` [PATCH 04/11] pci: don't shrink bridge resources Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 11:07 ` [PATCH 05/11] pci: update bridge res to get more big range in pci assign unssign Yinghai Lu
2010-01-19 21:48   ` Alex Chiang
2010-01-19 22:10     ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 11:07 ` [PATCH 06/11] pci: introduce pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 11:07 ` [PATCH 07/11] pci: pciehp clean flow in pciehp_configure_device Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 11:07 ` [PATCH 08/11] pci: pciehp second try to get big range for pcie devices Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 11:07 ` [PATCH 09/11] pci: pci_bridge_release_res Yinghai Lu
2010-01-19 21:57   ` Alex Chiang
2010-01-16 11:07 ` [PATCH 10/11] pciehp: add support for bridge resource reallocation Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 11:07 ` [PATCH 11/11] pci: set PCI_PREF_RANGE_TYPE_64 in pci_bridge_check_ranges Yinghai Lu
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-01-16  2:41 [PATCH 00/11] pci: update pci bridge resources Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16  2:41 ` [PATCH 01/11] pci: add pci_bridge_release_unused_res and pci_bus_release_unused_bridge_res Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16  3:57   ` Alex Chiang
2010-01-16 10:10     ` Yinghai Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B562DFE.7020006@kernel.org \
    --to=yinghai@kernel.org \
    --cc=achiang@hp.com \
    --cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
    --cc=ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox