From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Haicheng Li <haicheng.li@linux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
x86@kernel.org, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] x86: set hotpluggable nodes in nodes_possible_map
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 14:45:43 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B578797.3040908@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1001201152040.30528@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
On 01/20/2010 12:10 PM, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jan 2010, Haicheng Li wrote:
>
>> let's add more changes to fix naming issue as well since it's too confusing
>> for people to understand
>> the code logic. how about below patch?
>
> That should be a seperate change; there's a bugfix here (my patch) and
> then a cleanup patch that you could make incrementally on mine. I don't
> personally like the name "rest_nodes_parsed" since it's poor English, I
> suggest renaming nodes_parsed to mem_nodes_parsed as I originally asked
> and then cpu_nodes_parsed to acpi_nodes_parsed or something similiar.
>
> Ingo, the following is my bugfix patch that addresses the issue at
> http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/69499. Haicheng, can we add your
> tested-by line?
>
>
>
> x86: set hotpluggable nodes in nodes_possible_map
>
> nodes_possible_map does not currently include nodes that have SRAT
> entries that are all ACPI_SRAT_MEM_HOT_PLUGGABLE since the bit is cleared
> in nodes_parsed if it does not have an online address range.
>
> Unequivocally setting the bit in nodes_parsed is insufficient since
> existing code, such as acpi_get_nodes(), assumes all nodes in the map
> have online address ranges. In fact, all code using nodes_parsed assumes
> such nodes represent an address range of online memory.
>
> nodes_possible_map is created by unioning nodes_parsed and
> cpu_nodes_parsed; the former represents nodes with online memory and the
> latter represents memoryless nodes. We now set the bit for hotpluggable
> nodes in cpu_nodes_parsed so that it also gets set in nodes_possible_map.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c | 4 +++-
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
> @@ -229,9 +229,11 @@ update_nodes_add(int node, unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
> printk(KERN_ERR "SRAT: Hotplug zone not continuous. Partly ignored\n");
> }
>
> - if (changed)
> + if (changed) {
> + node_set(node, cpu_nodes_parsed);
> printk(KERN_INFO "SRAT: hot plug zone found %Lx - %Lx\n",
> nd->start, nd->end);
> + }
> }
>
> /* Callback for parsing of the Proximity Domain <-> Memory Area mappings */
if (ma->flags & ACPI_SRAT_MEM_HOT_PLUGGABLE) {
update_nodes_add(node, start, end);
/* restore nodes[node] */
*nd = oldnode;
if ((nd->start | nd->end) == 0)
node_clear(node, nodes_parsed);
}
removing clearing with nodes_parsed is not working?
YH
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-20 22:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-15 7:42 [PATCH] x86/mm/srat_64.c: nodes_parsed should include all nodes detected by ACPI Haicheng Li
2010-01-17 2:22 ` Haicheng Li
2010-01-17 21:53 ` David Rientjes
2010-01-18 6:30 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-18 10:43 ` David Rientjes
2010-01-19 11:08 ` Haicheng Li
2010-01-19 11:29 ` Haicheng Li
2010-01-19 23:30 ` David Rientjes
2010-01-20 16:40 ` Haicheng Li
2010-01-20 20:10 ` [patch] x86: set hotpluggable nodes in nodes_possible_map David Rientjes
2010-01-20 22:45 ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2010-01-20 23:32 ` David Rientjes
2010-01-21 3:00 ` Haicheng Li
2010-01-21 2:58 ` Haicheng Li
2010-01-21 6:58 ` David Rientjes
2010-01-21 7:31 ` Haicheng Li
2010-01-21 7:50 ` David Rientjes
2010-01-21 8:33 ` Haicheng Li
2010-01-21 23:12 ` David Rientjes
2010-01-22 4:06 ` [PATCH] x86/mm/srat_64.c: make node_possible_map include hotpluggable node Haicheng Li
2010-01-22 7:33 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-22 8:43 ` Haicheng Li
2010-01-22 10:14 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-22 10:35 ` Haicheng Li
2010-01-22 11:15 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86: Set hotpluggable nodes in nodes_possible_map tip-bot for David Rientjes
2010-01-23 6:51 ` tip-bot for David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B578797.3040908@kernel.org \
--to=yinghai@kernel.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=haicheng.li@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox