public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v5 0/38] x86: not use  bootmem for x86
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:14:50 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B5E501A.4000707@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B5E3A12.4030506@zytor.com>

On 01/25/2010 04:40 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> I have been looking at this patchset and tried it out; it has a build
> failure because of a naming conflict:
> 
> /home/hpa/kernel/linux-2.6-tip.range/drivers/pci/hotplug/ibmphp_res.c:43: error:
> conflicting types for ‘add_range’
> /home/hpa/kernel/linux-2.6-tip.range/include/linux/range.h:9: note:
> previous declaration of ‘add_range’ was here
> 
> "add_range" is static.
> 
> This makes me concerned that the naming is too generic.  In particular,
> we tend to prefer naming of the type subsystem_function(), so in this
> case range_add() might be a more suitable naming scheme.

ibmphp_res.c:static int add_range (int type, struct range_node *, struct bus_node *);
ibmphp_res.c:           add_range (flag, newrange, newbus);
ibmphp_res.c:static int add_range (int type, struct range_node *range, struct bus_node *bus_cur)
ibmphp_res.c: * the range numbers that they correspond to.  It was called from add_range fnc
ibmphp_res.c:                                                                   add_range (IO, range, bus_sec);
ibmphp_res.c:                                                                   add_range (MEM, range, bus_sec);
ibmphp_res.c:                                                                   add_range (PFMEM, range, bus_sec);

can we change name in ibmphp_res.c instead. that is local one.

> 
> I'm going to spend more time on this patchset.
> 
Thanks

Yinghai

      reply	other threads:[~2010-01-26  2:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-22  9:24 [PATCH -v5 0/38] x86: not use bootmem for x86 Yinghai Lu
2010-01-22  9:24 ` [PATCH 01/38] x86: move range related operation to one file Yinghai Lu
2010-01-22  9:24 ` [PATCH 02/38] x86: check range in update range Yinghai Lu
2010-01-22  9:24 ` [PATCH 03/38] x86/pci: use resource_size_t in update_res Yinghai Lu
2010-01-22  9:24 ` [PATCH 04/38] x86/pci: amd one chain system to use pci read out res Yinghai Lu
2010-01-22  9:24 ` [PATCH 05/38] x86/pci: use u64 instead of size_t in amd_bus.c Yinghai Lu
2010-01-22  9:24 ` [PATCH 06/38] x86/pci: add cap_resource Yinghai Lu
2010-01-22  9:24 ` [PATCH 07/38] x86/pci: enable pci root res read out for 32bit too Yinghai Lu
2010-01-22  9:24 ` [PATCH 08/38] x86: call early_res_to_bootmem one time Yinghai Lu
2010-01-22  9:24 ` [PATCH 09/38] x86: introduce max_early_res and early_res_count Yinghai Lu
2010-01-22  9:24 ` [PATCH 10/38] x86: dynamic increase early_res array size Yinghai Lu
2010-01-22  9:24 ` [PATCH 11/38] x86: print bootmem free before pci_iommu_alloc and free_all_bootmem -v2 Yinghai Lu
2010-01-22  9:24 ` [PATCH 12/38] x86: make early_node_mem get mem > 4g if possible Yinghai Lu
2010-01-22  9:24 ` [PATCH 13/38] x86: only call dma32_reserve_bootmem 64bit !CONFIG_NUMA Yinghai Lu
2010-01-22  9:24 ` [PATCH 14/38] x86: make 64 bit use early_res instead of bootmem before slab Yinghai Lu
2010-01-22  9:24 ` [PATCH 15/38] sparsemem: put usemap for one node together Yinghai Lu
2010-01-22  9:24 ` [PATCH 16/38] sparsemem: put mem map " Yinghai Lu
2010-01-22  9:24 ` [PATCH 17/38] x86: change range end to start+size Yinghai Lu
2010-01-22  9:24 ` [PATCH 18/38] x86: move bios page reserve early to head32/64.c Yinghai Lu
2010-01-22  9:24 ` [PATCH 19/38] x86: seperate early_res related code from e820.c Yinghai Lu
2010-01-22  9:24 ` [PATCH 20/38] x86: add find_early_area_size Yinghai Lu
2010-01-22  9:24 ` [PATCH 21/38] x86: move back find_e820_area to e820.c Yinghai Lu
2010-01-22  9:24 ` [PATCH 22/38] early_res: enhance check_and_double_early_res Yinghai Lu
2010-01-22  9:24 ` [PATCH 23/38] x86: make 32bit support NO_BOOTMEM Yinghai Lu
2010-01-22  9:24 ` [PATCH 24/38] move round_up/down to kernel.h Yinghai Lu
2010-01-22 14:52   ` Christoph Lameter
2010-01-22 19:28     ` Joe Perches
2010-01-22 20:08       ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-22  9:24 ` [PATCH 25/38] x86: add find_fw_memmap_area Yinghai Lu
2010-01-22  9:24 ` [PATCH 26/38] core: move early_res Yinghai Lu
2010-01-22  9:24 ` [PATCH 27/38] x86: print out for RAM buffer Yinghai Lu
2010-01-22  9:24 ` [PATCH 28/38] x86: remove bios data range from e820 Yinghai Lu
2010-01-22  9:24 ` [PATCH 29/38] x86/pci: add mmconf range into e820 for when it is from MSR with amd faml0h Yinghai Lu
2010-01-22  9:24 ` [PATCH 30/38] irq: remove not need bootmem code Yinghai Lu
2010-01-22  9:24 ` [PATCH 31/38] radix: move radix init early Yinghai Lu
2010-01-22  9:24 ` [PATCH 32/38] sparseirq: change irq_desc_ptrs to static Yinghai Lu
2010-01-22  9:24 ` [PATCH 33/38] sparseirq: use radix_tree instead of ptrs array Yinghai Lu
2010-01-22  9:24 ` [PATCH 34/38] x86: remove arch_probe_nr_irqs Yinghai Lu
2010-01-22  9:24 ` [PATCH 35/38] use nr_cpus= to set nr_cpu_ids early Yinghai Lu
2010-01-22  9:24 ` [PATCH 36/38] x86: according to nr_cpu_ids to decide if need to leave logical flat Yinghai Lu
2010-01-22  9:24 ` [PATCH 37/38] x86: make 32bit apic flat to physflat switch like 64bit Yinghai Lu
2010-01-22  9:24 ` [PATCH 38/38] x86: use num_processors for possible cpus Yinghai Lu
2010-01-26  0:40 ` [PATCH -v5 0/38] x86: not use bootmem for x86 H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-26  2:14   ` Yinghai Lu [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B5E501A.4000707@kernel.org \
    --to=yinghai@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox