From: Michael Reinelt <michael@reinelt.co.at>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Roman Jarosz <kedgedev@gmail.com>,
A Rojas <nqn1976list@gmail.com>,
"A. Boulan" <arnaud.boulan@libertysurf.fr>,
jcnengel@googlemail.com, rientjes@google.com, earny@net4u.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>,
stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Selectively enable self-reclaim
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:30:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B6023DF.5070605@reinelt.co.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B602186.8050303@cs.helsinki.fi>
Pekka Enberg schrieb:
> Chris Wilson kirjoitti:
>> Having missed the ENOMEM return via i915_gem_fault(), there are probably
>> other paths that I also missed. By not enabling NORETRY by default these
>> paths can run the shrinker and take memory from the system (but not from
>> our own inactive lists because our shrinker can not run whilst we hold
>> the struct mutex) and this may allow the system to survive a little
>> longer
>> whilst our drivers consume all available memory.
>>
>> References:
>> OOM killer unexpectedly called with kernel 2.6.32
>> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14933
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
>> Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
>> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk>
>> Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
>> Cc: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
>> Cc: stable@kernel.org
>
> Roman, can you give this patch a spin?
I'm willing to test it, too (I can easily reproduce the problem), but I don't use (and know nothing about) git. Is there
a way for me to test it?
--
Michael Reinelt <michael@reinelt.co.at>
http://home.pages.at/reinelt
GPG-Key 0xDF13BA50
ICQ #288386781
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-27 11:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-14 13:15 OOM-Killer kills too much with 2.6.32.2 Roman Jarosz
2010-01-23 0:40 ` David Rientjes
2010-01-25 22:12 ` Roman Jarosz
2010-01-25 1:48 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-01-25 20:47 ` Roman Jarosz
2010-01-26 5:19 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-01-26 7:51 ` A Rojas
2010-01-26 9:06 ` Roman Jarosz
2010-01-26 11:07 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-01-26 12:33 ` Chris Wilson
2010-01-26 13:03 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-01-26 13:18 ` Chris Wilson
2010-01-26 13:59 ` Michael Reinelt
2010-01-26 14:07 ` Michael Reinelt
2010-01-27 0:50 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-01-27 9:56 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-01-27 10:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-01-27 11:12 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-01-27 11:14 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Selectively enable self-reclaim Chris Wilson
2010-01-27 11:20 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-01-27 11:30 ` Michael Reinelt [this message]
2010-01-28 3:15 ` Michael Reinelt
2010-01-28 18:21 ` Roman Jarosz
2010-01-27 11:50 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-01-27 12:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-01-27 12:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-01-27 15:25 ` Chris Wilson
2010-01-27 16:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-01-27 17:14 ` Chris Wilson
2010-01-27 17:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-01-27 21:03 ` Roman Jarosz
2010-06-30 6:54 ` [Intel-gfx] " Dave Airlie
2010-06-30 7:05 ` Chris Wilson
2010-06-30 23:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-07-01 1:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-07-01 1:55 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-07-01 10:15 ` Dave Airlie
2010-07-01 11:19 ` Chris Wilson
2010-07-01 22:34 ` M. Vefa Bicakci
2010-07-01 23:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-07-02 0:06 ` Dave Airlie
2010-07-02 0:49 ` Dave Airlie
2010-07-02 1:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-07-17 18:58 ` M. Vefa Bicakci
2010-07-17 19:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-07-18 14:27 ` M. Vefa Bicakci
2010-07-18 16:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-01-28 6:37 ` Willy Tarreau
2010-01-26 13:41 ` OOM-Killer kills too much with 2.6.32.2 Roman Jarosz
2010-01-27 0:14 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-01-27 9:53 ` Roman Jarosz
2010-01-26 13:57 ` Pekka Enberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B6023DF.5070605@reinelt.co.at \
--to=michael@reinelt.co.at \
--cc=arnaud.boulan@libertysurf.fr \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=earny@net4u.de \
--cc=eric@anholt.net \
--cc=hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=jcnengel@googlemail.com \
--cc=kedgedev@gmail.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nqn1976list@gmail.com \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox