From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751349Ab0BGFL0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Feb 2010 00:11:26 -0500 Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:50389 "EHLO ironport2-out.pppoe.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751118Ab0BGFLZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Feb 2010 00:11:25 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjkBAPfZbUtLd/sX/2dsb2JhbAAIgyrFUo8ZgS+CSlsE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,420,1262581200"; d="scan'208";a="55478731" Message-ID: <4B6E4B7B.9010201@teksavvy.com> Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2010 00:11:23 -0500 From: Mark Lord User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kyle McMartin CC: Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.33-rc7 References: <4B6E4793.3010201@teksavvy.com> <20100207045844.GS24051@bombadil.infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20100207045844.GS24051@bombadil.infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Kyle McMartin wrote: > On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 11:54:43PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote: >> I just wish the GNU tar folk had the sense to combine -z and -j >> into a single flag. .. > Shouldn't be needed anymore... .. Ouch. 'tar xf' does indeed seem to work. But I've got nearly 20 years of habit now in 'tar xzf', and 'z' still fails on .bz2 files. Damn! ;)