From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: mszeredi@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
fuse-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, polynomial-c@gentoo.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [fuse-devel] [PATCH] FUSE/CUSE: implement direct mmap support
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:36:34 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B729A42.102@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B7296DF.207@kernel.org>
On 02/10/2010 08:22 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> So, I don't think it's feasible to do the address matching from inside
> the kernel without a lot of convolution.
To clarify a bit. The alignment is still a must. What's
theoretically feasible with convolution is hiding the alignment from
the userland server by adjusting virtual addresses of maps, but this
will visibly break alignment as seen from the clients (e.g. client may
not be able to unmap part of existing mmap and mmap SHMLBA aligned
disjoint part there) even if we ignore the fact that implementation
would be so invasive to the vm layer that it has no possibility of
getting accepted.
SHMLBA is something that a user of shm should know anyway. I don't
think it's too much to ask for from FUSE servers which would implement
direct mmap and it's easy to detect and enforce too. The proposed
libfuse patch abort()s if the condition is not met.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-10 11:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-09 6:08 [PATCH] FUSE/CUSE: implement direct mmap support Tejun Heo
2010-02-09 14:59 ` [fuse-devel] " Miklos Szeredi
2010-02-10 11:22 ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-10 11:29 ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-02-10 11:56 ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-10 12:15 ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-02-10 12:35 ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-10 15:02 ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-02-10 23:43 ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-11 9:31 ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-02-11 9:51 ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-02-11 11:54 ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-11 12:25 ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-02-11 12:49 ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-11 12:46 ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-02-11 13:05 ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-11 13:08 ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-02-11 13:40 ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-11 11:47 ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-11 12:34 ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-02-11 12:56 ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-11 13:01 ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-02-11 13:30 ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-11 13:40 ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-02-11 13:58 ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-11 14:40 ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-02-12 0:07 ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-12 0:25 ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-12 9:55 ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-02-12 13:33 ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-12 13:53 ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-02-12 17:56 ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-10 11:36 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2010-02-10 8:24 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2010-02-10 8:40 ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-02-10 8:58 ` Paul Schutte
2010-02-10 10:02 ` Paul Schutte
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B729A42.102@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fuse-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=mszeredi@suse.cz \
--cc=polynomial-c@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox