public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: mszeredi@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	fuse-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, polynomial-c@gentoo.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [fuse-devel] [PATCH] FUSE/CUSE: implement direct mmap support
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 22:05:43 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B7400A7.5070105@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1NfYRH-00035s-4h@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>

Hello,

On 02/11/2010 09:46 PM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> The problem with that is you simply can't determine in advance where
> the region will grow.  Okay, you can leave space according to the size
> of the file, but the size of the file can grow too.
> 
> *This* is the complexity that I want to get rid of.

Alright, then let's talk about that, not SHMLBA which doesn't really
have much to do with this.  So, you're basically saying that you want
multiple address spaces.  In that case, the only logical abstraction
for that are files.  ie. We need to be passing file descriptors to the
server and asking the server which descriptor it would want to use,
which was the previous implementation, which you objected mentioning
that this type of direct mmap would probably be useful only for device
mmap implementations.

The address space provided for dmmap is huge.  It's any range which
pgoff_t can address.  I really can't imagine managing allocation from
that space causing problems.  If you want to use it for multiple huge
mappings, we can't use the simple implementation w/ pinned pages
anyway.  We'll have to borrow anonymous file implementation or
implement private swap backing.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2010-02-11 12:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-09  6:08 [PATCH] FUSE/CUSE: implement direct mmap support Tejun Heo
2010-02-09 14:59 ` [fuse-devel] " Miklos Szeredi
2010-02-10 11:22   ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-10 11:29     ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-02-10 11:56       ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-10 12:15         ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-02-10 12:35           ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-10 15:02             ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-02-10 23:43               ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-11  9:31                 ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-02-11  9:51                   ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-02-11 11:54                     ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-11 12:25                       ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-02-11 12:49                         ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-11 12:46                           ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-02-11 13:05                             ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2010-02-11 13:08                               ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-02-11 13:40                                 ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-11 11:47                   ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-11 12:34                     ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-02-11 12:56                       ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-11 13:01                         ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-02-11 13:30                           ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-11 13:40                             ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-02-11 13:58                               ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-11 14:40                                 ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-02-12  0:07                                   ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-12  0:25                                     ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-12  9:55                                     ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-02-12 13:33                                       ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-12 13:53                                         ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-02-12 17:56                                           ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-10 11:36     ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-10  8:24 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2010-02-10  8:40   ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-02-10  8:58   ` Paul Schutte
2010-02-10 10:02     ` Paul Schutte

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B7400A7.5070105@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=fuse-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=mszeredi@suse.cz \
    --cc=polynomial-c@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox