From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: mszeredi@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
fuse-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, polynomial-c@gentoo.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [fuse-devel] [PATCH] FUSE/CUSE: implement direct mmap support
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 22:30:05 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B74065D.2000707@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1NfYfb-00039p-Uh@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
Hello,
On 02/11/2010 10:01 PM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>> That's the requirement coming from allowing the server to determine
>> how these mmaps are served, not from the fact that the management is
>> done via server side mmaps or the server maps those regions into its
>> process address space. No matter how you do it, if you want to mix
>> and match client mmap requests, the SHMLBA alignment will be visible.
>
> Can you give an example?
Hmmm... I don't have any specific example. osspd is the only real
thing which uses it and it serves each mmap request with a separate
region. Oh... the fmmap example program serves the same region to
mmap requests coming from the same UID, so it does both sharing and
putting maps apart.
>> I suppose you're talking about not allowing offsets to be adjusted at
>> all but I don't think that's a restriction we would want to have at
>> the kernel API level because offset might encode different things for
>> device mmaps.
>
> Possibly. But there's some confusion about offsets again. This
> offset is not the same as the one currently returned in fuse_mmap_out.
This offset is the offset client requests.
> And neither is the SHMLBA alignment requirement so clear:
>
> You say, that ossp ignores the client mmap offset. So basically it
> resets the offset to zero, whatever it was, no? That sounds fine, but
> then you are adjusting the offset by something not necessarily a
> multiple of SHMLBA.
Yeap and that would be a bug. It will probably have to do % SHMLBA on
the offset. I don't think all OSS drivers would be caring about these
stuff anyway. Most of them work on only x86 where SHMLBA == PAGE_SIZE.
> So there are different offsets:
>
> a) vma->vm_pgoff (which may mean anything, but usually means b)
Yeap, vma->vm_pgoff can be any value and doesn't really matter. The
only visible difference would be the /proc listing, right? Setting
this to the requested offset is trivial.
> b) the offset at which the pages of the mapping are located
> c) the offset at which the server side mmap is located
There are three offsets.
a) the offset a client requested
b) the offset into dmmap AS, a client mmap region is mapped to. This
could be different from a) by multiple of SHMLBA / PAGE_SIZE.
c) the offset into dmmap AS, a server mmap region is mapped to, where
collection of these mmaps define the dmmap AS.
The offsets used in b) and c) are the same offsets.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-11 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-09 6:08 [PATCH] FUSE/CUSE: implement direct mmap support Tejun Heo
2010-02-09 14:59 ` [fuse-devel] " Miklos Szeredi
2010-02-10 11:22 ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-10 11:29 ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-02-10 11:56 ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-10 12:15 ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-02-10 12:35 ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-10 15:02 ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-02-10 23:43 ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-11 9:31 ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-02-11 9:51 ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-02-11 11:54 ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-11 12:25 ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-02-11 12:49 ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-11 12:46 ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-02-11 13:05 ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-11 13:08 ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-02-11 13:40 ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-11 11:47 ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-11 12:34 ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-02-11 12:56 ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-11 13:01 ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-02-11 13:30 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2010-02-11 13:40 ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-02-11 13:58 ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-11 14:40 ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-02-12 0:07 ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-12 0:25 ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-12 9:55 ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-02-12 13:33 ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-12 13:53 ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-02-12 17:56 ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-10 11:36 ` Tejun Heo
2010-02-10 8:24 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2010-02-10 8:40 ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-02-10 8:58 ` Paul Schutte
2010-02-10 10:02 ` Paul Schutte
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B74065D.2000707@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fuse-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=mszeredi@suse.cz \
--cc=polynomial-c@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox