From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755713Ab0BOPYx (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Feb 2010 10:24:53 -0500 Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:62972 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755484Ab0BOPYw (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Feb 2010 10:24:52 -0500 Message-ID: <4B79673B.7050908@trash.net> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 16:24:43 +0100 From: Patrick McHardy User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090701) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" CC: "David S. Miller" , Herbert Xu , Paul Moore , David Woodhouse , Sridhar Samudrala , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tun: socket filter support References: <20100214110110.GC30182@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20100214110110.GC30182@redhat.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > + case TUNATTACHFILTER: > + /* Can be set only for TAPs */ > + ret = -EINVAL; > + if ((tun->flags & TUN_TYPE_MASK) != TUN_TAP_DEV) > + break; > + ret = -EFAULT; > + if (copy_from_user(&fprog, argp, sizeof(fprog))) > + break; > + > + ret = sk_attach_filter(&fprog, tun->socket.sk); > + break; > + > + case TUNDETACHFILTER: > + /* Can be set only for TAPs */ > + ret = -EINVAL; > + if ((tun->flags & TUN_TYPE_MASK) != TUN_TAP_DEV) > + break; > + ret = sk_detach_filter(tun->socket.sk); > + break; > + I'm not sure how the tun socket is exposed, but won't the regular SO_ATTACH_FILTER/SO_DETACH_FILTER setsockopts already work for tun sockets?