From: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: "Robert Schöne" <robert.schoene@tu-dresden.de>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Patch for tracing c states (power_end) on x86
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:36:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B84E51A.900@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1266999573.3415.8.camel@localhost>
Robert Schöne wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Since noone replied to my last mail (Febr. 15th, 11:42), describing the
> way to fix the missing c-state tracing, here's a patch.
> Maybe its easier that way.
>
> (I used the perf-fixes-for-linus git tree to obtain a
> more-then-up-to-date version)
>
> Bye Robert
>
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> index 02d6780..b1cfb88 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> @@ -384,6 +384,7 @@ void default_idle(void)
> else
> local_irq_enable();
> current_thread_info()->status |= TS_POLLING;
> + trace_power_end(1);
> } else {
> local_irq_enable();
> /* loop is done by the caller */
> @@ -451,6 +452,7 @@ void mwait_idle_with_hints(unsigned long ax,
> unsigned long cx)
> if (!need_resched())
> __mwait(ax, cx);
> }
> + trace_power_end((ax>>4)+1);
The only argument of trace_power_end() is a dummy, so you can just
pass 0 or 1 to the trace hook, actually better pass 0 to be
consistent with other parts.
The dummy argument can't be eliminated, because the macros that
automatically generates racing code have some limitations, and
seems it's not so easy to get over.
> }
>
> /* Default MONITOR/MWAIT with no hints, used for default C1 state */
> @@ -467,6 +469,7 @@ static void mwait_idle(void)
> __sti_mwait(0, 0);
> else
> local_irq_enable();
> + trace_power_end(1);
> } else
> local_irq_enable();
> }
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-24 8:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-24 8:19 Patch for tracing c states (power_end) on x86 Robert Schöne
2010-02-24 8:36 ` Li Zefan [this message]
2010-02-24 8:44 ` Robert Schöne
2010-02-24 9:00 ` Li Zefan
2010-02-24 9:05 ` Robert Schöne
2010-02-25 12:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-11 6:36 ` Robert Schöne
2010-03-11 8:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-11 10:56 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B84E51A.900@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=robert.schoene@tu-dresden.de \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox