public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] KVM: SVM: Optimize nested svm msrpm merging
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:28:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B87A248.1050300@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1267118149-15737-3-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com>

On 02/25/2010 07:15 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> This patch optimizes the way the msrpm of the host and the
> guest are merged. The old code merged the 2 msrpm pages
> completly. This code needed to touch 24kb of memory for that
> operation. The optimized variant this patch introduces
> merges only the parts where the host msrpm may contain zero
> bits. This reduces the amount of memory which is touched to
> 48 bytes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel<joerg.roedel@amd.com>
> ---
>   arch/x86/kvm/svm.c |   67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>   1 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> index d8d4e35..d15e0ea 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> @@ -92,6 +92,9 @@ struct nested_state {
>
>   };
>
> +#define MSRPM_OFFSETS	16
> +static u32 msrpm_offsets[MSRPM_OFFSETS] __read_mostly;
> +
>   struct vcpu_svm {
>   	struct kvm_vcpu vcpu;
>   	struct vmcb *vmcb;
> @@ -436,6 +439,34 @@ err_1:
>
>   }
>
> +static void add_msr_offset(u32 offset)
> +{
> +	u32 old;
> +	int i;
> +
> +again:
> +	for (i = 0; i<  MSRPM_OFFSETS; ++i) {
> +		old = msrpm_offsets[i];
> +
> +		if (old == offset)
> +			return;
> +
> +		if (old != MSR_INVALID)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		if (cmpxchg(&msrpm_offsets[i], old, offset) != old)
> +			goto again;
> +
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If this BUG triggers the msrpm_offsets table has an overflow. Just
> +	 * increase MSRPM_OFFSETS in this case.
> +	 */
> +	BUG();
> +}
>    

Why all this atomic cleverness?  The possible offsets are all determined 
statically.  Even if you do them dynamically (makes sense when 
considering pmu passthrough), it's per-vcpu and therefore single 
threaded (just move msrpm_offsets into vcpu context).

> @@ -1846,20 +1882,33 @@ static int nested_svm_vmexit(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
>
>   static bool nested_svm_vmrun_msrpm(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
>   {
> -	u32 *nested_msrpm;
> -	struct page *page;
> +	/*
> +	 * This function merges the msr permission bitmaps of kvm and the
> +	 * nested vmcb. It is omptimized in that it only merges the parts where
> +	 * the kvm msr permission bitmap may contain zero bits
> +	 */
>    

A comment that describes the entire function can be moved above the 
function, freeing a whole tab stop for contents.


-- 
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.


  reply	other threads:[~2010-02-26 10:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-25 17:15 [PATCH 0/5] Rework of msrpm optimization and additional fixes for nested svm Joerg Roedel
2010-02-25 17:15 ` [PATCH 1/5] KVM: SVM: Move msrpm offset calculation to seperate function Joerg Roedel
2010-02-26 10:20   ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-26 10:25     ` Joerg Roedel
2010-02-25 17:15 ` [PATCH 2/5] KVM: SVM: Optimize nested svm msrpm merging Joerg Roedel
2010-02-26 10:28   ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2010-02-26 12:25     ` Joerg Roedel
2010-02-26 12:28       ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-26 13:04         ` Joerg Roedel
2010-02-26 13:08           ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-26 13:19             ` Joerg Roedel
2010-02-26 13:10           ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-26 13:21             ` Joerg Roedel
2010-02-26 13:26               ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-26 13:30                 ` Joerg Roedel
2010-02-26 13:59                   ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-26 12:42       ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-25 17:15 ` [PATCH 3/5] KVM: SVM: Use svm_msrpm_offset in nested_svm_exit_handled_msr Joerg Roedel
2010-02-26 10:30   ` Avi Kivity
2010-03-01 13:33     ` Joerg Roedel
2010-02-25 17:15 ` [PATCH 4/5] KVM: SVM: Add correct handling of nested iopm Joerg Roedel
2010-02-26 10:33   ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-25 17:15 ` [PATCH 5/5] KVM: SVM: Ignore lower 12 bit of nested msrpm_pa Joerg Roedel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B87A248.1050300@redhat.com \
    --to=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox