public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jayson R. King" <dev@jaysonking.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Stable team <stable@kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jayson King <dev@jaysonking.com>
Subject: [02/11] percpu counter: clean up percpu_counter_sum_and_set()
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 00:32:19 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B88BC73.8030900@jaysonking.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B88BA1B.4050500@jaysonking.com>

From: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu Oct 9 12:50:59 2008 -0400
Subject: percpu counter: clean up percpu_counter_sum_and_set()

commit 1f7c14c62ce63805f9574664a6c6de3633d4a354 upstream.

percpu_counter_sum_and_set() and percpu_counter_sum() is the same except
the former updates the global counter after accounting.  Since we are
taking the fbc->lock to calculate the precise value of the counter in
percpu_counter_sum() anyway, it should simply set fbc->count too, as the
percpu_counter_sum_and_set() does.

This patch merges these two interfaces into one.

Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Jayson R. King <dev@jaysonking.com>

---
 fs/ext4/balloc.c               |    2 +-
 include/linux/percpu_counter.h |   12 +++---------
 lib/percpu_counter.c           |    8 +++-----
 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff -urNp linux-2.6.27.orig/fs/ext4/balloc.c linux-2.6.27/fs/ext4/balloc.c
--- linux-2.6.27.orig/fs/ext4/balloc.c	2010-02-26 14:10:41.167252303 -0600
+++ linux-2.6.27/fs/ext4/balloc.c	2010-02-26 14:18:30.811252658 -0600
@@ -1778,7 +1778,7 @@ ext4_fsblk_t ext4_has_free_blocks(struct
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 	if (free_blocks - root_blocks < FBC_BATCH)
 		free_blocks =
-			percpu_counter_sum_and_set(&sbi->s_freeblocks_counter);
+			percpu_counter_sum(&sbi->s_freeblocks_counter);
 #endif
 	if (free_blocks <= root_blocks)
 		/* we don't have free space */
diff -urNp linux-2.6.27.orig/include/linux/percpu_counter.h linux-2.6.27/include/linux/percpu_counter.h
--- linux-2.6.27.orig/include/linux/percpu_counter.h	2010-02-26 14:10:41.961252665 -0600
+++ linux-2.6.27/include/linux/percpu_counter.h	2010-02-26 14:18:30.811252658 -0600
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ int percpu_counter_init_irq(struct percp
 void percpu_counter_destroy(struct percpu_counter *fbc);
 void percpu_counter_set(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount);
 void __percpu_counter_add(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount, s32 batch);
-s64 __percpu_counter_sum(struct percpu_counter *fbc, int set);
+s64 __percpu_counter_sum(struct percpu_counter *fbc);
 
 static inline void percpu_counter_add(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount)
 {
@@ -44,19 +44,13 @@ static inline void percpu_counter_add(st
 
 static inline s64 percpu_counter_sum_positive(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
 {
-	s64 ret = __percpu_counter_sum(fbc, 0);
+	s64 ret = __percpu_counter_sum(fbc);
 	return ret < 0 ? 0 : ret;
 }
 
-static inline s64 percpu_counter_sum_and_set(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
-{
-	return __percpu_counter_sum(fbc, 1);
-}
-
-
 static inline s64 percpu_counter_sum(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
 {
-	return __percpu_counter_sum(fbc, 0);
+	return __percpu_counter_sum(fbc);
 }
 
 static inline s64 percpu_counter_read(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
diff -urNp linux-2.6.27.orig/lib/percpu_counter.c linux-2.6.27/lib/percpu_counter.c
--- linux-2.6.27.orig/lib/percpu_counter.c	2010-02-26 14:10:42.176252671 -0600
+++ linux-2.6.27/lib/percpu_counter.c	2010-02-26 14:18:30.811252658 -0600
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__percpu_counter_add);
  * Add up all the per-cpu counts, return the result.  This is a more accurate
  * but much slower version of percpu_counter_read_positive()
  */
-s64 __percpu_counter_sum(struct percpu_counter *fbc, int set)
+s64 __percpu_counter_sum(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
 {
 	s64 ret;
 	int cpu;
@@ -62,11 +62,9 @@ s64 __percpu_counter_sum(struct percpu_c
 	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
 		s32 *pcount = per_cpu_ptr(fbc->counters, cpu);
 		ret += *pcount;
-		if (set)
-			*pcount = 0;
+		*pcount = 0;
 	}
-	if (set)
-		fbc->count = ret;
+	fbc->count = ret;
 
 	spin_unlock(&fbc->lock);
 	return ret;

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-02-27  7:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-27  6:22 [00/11] fix ext4 deadlock on 2.6.27.y Jayson R. King
2010-02-27  6:32 ` [01/11] ext4: invalidate pages if delalloc block allocation fails Jayson R. King
2010-02-27  6:32 ` Jayson R. King [this message]
2010-02-27  6:32 ` [03/11] ext4: Make sure all the block allocation paths reserve blocks Jayson R. King
2010-02-27  6:32 ` [04/11] ext4: Add percpu dirty block accounting Jayson R. King
2010-02-27  6:32 ` [05/11] ext4: Retry block reservation Jayson R. King
2010-02-27  6:32 ` [06/11] ext4: Retry block allocation if we have free blocks left Jayson R. King
2010-02-27  6:33 ` [07/11] ext4: Use tag dirty lookup during mpage_da_submit_io Jayson R. King
2010-02-27  6:33 ` [08/11] vfs: Remove the range_cont writeback mode Jayson R. King
2010-02-27  6:33 ` [09/11] vfs: Add no_nrwrite_index_update writeback control flag Jayson R. King
2010-02-27  6:33 ` [10/11] ext4: Fix file fragmentation during large file write Jayson R. King
2010-02-27  6:33 ` [11/11] ext4: Implement range_cyclic in ext4_da_writepages instead of write_cache_pages Jayson R. King
2010-02-28  3:16 ` [00/11] fix ext4 deadlock on 2.6.27.y Greg KH
2010-03-15 20:09   ` [stable] " Greg KH
2010-03-15 23:17     ` tytso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B88BC73.8030900@jaysonking.com \
    --to=dev@jaysonking.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox