From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751762Ab0CASZk (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Mar 2010 13:25:40 -0500 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:40278 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750976Ab0CASZj (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Mar 2010 13:25:39 -0500 Message-ID: <4B8C068A.4040402@zytor.com> Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 10:25:14 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100120 Fedora/3.0.1-1.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Luca Barbieri CC: mingo@elte.hu, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, paulus@samba.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fix atomic64_add_unless return value convention References: <1267463700-25524-1-git-send-email-luca@luca-barbieri.com> In-Reply-To: <1267463700-25524-1-git-send-email-luca@luca-barbieri.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/01/2010 09:14 AM, Luca Barbieri wrote: > Return values 0 and 1 were swapped both in the generic implementation and > my x86-32 one. > > The x86-32 and atomic64_test.c patches should probably be squashed in the > appropriate commits in tip/x86/atomic We tend to be very reluctant to do that. Anyway, please resend your patches with actual patch descriptions (commit messages). -hpa