Re: [PATCH -v11] x86: fix out of order of gsi -- partial

[Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>]

On 03/01/2010 06:40 AM, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> On Sunday 28 February 2010 10:05:33 Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> On 02/28/2010 12:09 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>>
>>> * Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> From: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
>>>>
>>>> found IBM x3950 will have problem after
>>>>
>>>> |commit b9c61b70075c87a8612624736faf4a2de5b1ed30
>>>
>>> Have you seen the commit notifications i sent for the v8 patches:
>>>
>>> Commit-ID:  ca8c764cb39bf6cade71933b38e8c830eb8b73c6
>>> Commit-ID:  519d637a93116ffbcd50e9e3f2591f41584f372c
>>>
>>> Those include a much improved changelogs - please adopt those. (and preferably 
>>> send deltas against tip:tmp.x86/apic.)
>>
>> please drop those two.
>>  
>> will send v12 to you.
> Eh, not sure, but could it be Ingo forgot the 2nd
> part of v12?
> 
> In linux-2.6-tip I see:
> commit fad539956c9e69749a03f7817d22d1bab87657bf
> Author: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
> Date:   Sun Feb 28 01:06:34 2010 -0800
> 
>     x86: Fix out of order of gsi
> 
> which equals:
> [PATCH -v12 1/2] x86: fix out of order of gsi -- partial
> 
> but I cannot see:
> [PATCH -v12 2/2] x86: fix out of order of gsi - full
> 
> Also this machine booted/worked fine up to 2.6.30.
> Any chance this will get addressed in stable@ kernel(s)?
> 

patch 1/2: should be with stable@ #.32 and #.33

patch 2/2: could be only with 2.6.34 or 2.6.35

Thanks

Yinghai