From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752840Ab0CBAhr (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Mar 2010 19:37:47 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:30640 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751792Ab0CBAhq (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Mar 2010 19:37:46 -0500 Message-ID: <4B8C5DD3.4060804@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 18:37:39 -0600 From: Eric Sandeen User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Justin Piszcz CC: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alan Piszcz Subject: Re: EXT4 is ~2X as slow as XFS (593MB/s vs 304MB/s) for writes? References: <4B8C56F8.70503@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4B8C56F8.70503@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Eric Sandeen wrote: > Justin Piszcz wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Is it possible to 'optimize' ext4 so it is as fast as XFS for writes? >> I see about half the performance as XFS for sequential writes. >> >> I have checked the doc and tried several options, a few of which are shown >> below (I have also tried the commit/journal_async/etc options but none >> of them get the write speeds anywhere near XFS)? >> >> Sure 'dd' is not a real benchmark, etc, etc, but with 10Gbps between 2 >> hosts I get 550MiB/s+ on reads from EXT4 but only 100-200MiB/s write. >> >> When it was XFS I used to get 400-600MiB/s for writes for the same RAID >> volume. >> >> How do I 'speed' up ext4? Is it possible? >> > > FWIW I'm seeing similar things on fast storage (Fusion IO), > though this is under 2.6.31. 500MB/s+ for xfs, 300 for ext4. > > Overwriting an existing file is no faster. I don't think this > driver is blktraceable but I'll try a newer driver that should be I think. FWIW, blktrace (I'm still on 2.6.31) is enlightening: Total (xfs): Reads Queued: 4, 16KiB Writes Queued: 122,567, 10,485MiB Read Dispatches: 4, 16KiB Write Dispatches: 83,219, 10,485MiB Reads Requeued: 0 Writes Requeued: 0 Reads Completed: 4, 16KiB Writes Completed: 83,219, 10,485MiB Read Merges: 0, 0KiB Write Merges: 39,348, 314,804KiB IO unplugs: 344 Timer unplugs: 338 Total (ext4): Reads Queued: 14, 56KiB Writes Queued: 2,621K, 10,486MiB Read Dispatches: 14, 56KiB Write Dispatches: 107,944, 10,486MiB Reads Requeued: 0 Writes Requeued: 0 Reads Completed: 14, 56KiB Writes Completed: 107,944, 10,486MiB Read Merges: 0, 0KiB Write Merges: 2,513K, 10,054MiB IO unplugs: 2,461 Timer unplugs: 2,020 See "Writes Queued" See also submit_bio() calls in xfs. ext4 doing things a block at a time is certainly giving the elevator a workout... I'd tend to chalk it up to that at first glance. -Eric