From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753919Ab0CDOf1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Mar 2010 09:35:27 -0500 Received: from pindarots.xs4all.nl ([80.101.128.228]:53497 "EHLO pindarots.xs4all.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753410Ab0CDOfZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Mar 2010 09:35:25 -0500 Message-ID: <4B8FC4F1.70605@xs4all.nl> Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 15:34:25 +0100 From: Udo van den Heuvel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100225 Fedora/3.0.2-1.fc12 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andre Prendel CC: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] 2.6.33 on jetway nc81-lf board References: <4B8C0598.2060000@xs4all.nl> <20100302213709.951ee97b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20100304091741.GA1995@andre-laptop> In-Reply-To: <20100304091741.GA1995@andre-laptop> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/04/2010 10:17 AM, Andre Prendel wrote: > On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 09:37:09PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: >> (cc lm-sensors) >> >> On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:21:12 +0100 Udo van den Heuvel wrote: (....) >>> No other sensor-related modules are loaded. >>> >>> What could be wrong? > > See lm-sensors FAQ Chapter3 #39: > > http://www.lm-sensors.org/wiki/FAQ/Chapter3#Mysensorshavestoppedworkinginkernel2.6.31 Thanks, but the explanation implies no real fix other than more consciously choosing to put system stability at risk. Is a better fix in the making? Kind regards, Udo