From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755356Ab0CELYb (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Mar 2010 06:24:31 -0500 Received: from mail-gy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.160.174]:41300 "EHLO mail-gy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755021Ab0CELYa (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Mar 2010 06:24:30 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=IIO25bf8V4Ih+b5df2HdBXEt++5QkNhHlgCGIazjeBsz69u+TtKl6+ZQ5ts7q5Q2i1 rLU3IOGq0lYaMBzmIZKM5BIG5CoIRtJNBv1XArnS/jcMFqqe5GJXz4ShnD9lIFHoTgQ4 k6goO1gUoeNDshyuE2YRystZQ4Qcqq0DerWmk= Message-ID: <4B90E9EA.9030708@garzik.org> Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2010 06:24:26 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100301 Fedora/3.0.3-1.fc11 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adam Jackson CC: Matthew Garrett , Dave Airlie , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.sf.net Subject: Re: [git pull] drm request 3 References: <20100304185002.GA23532@srcf.ucam.org> <20100304190450.GA23807@srcf.ucam.org> <4B900AB2.1020603@garzik.org> <1267741133.1316.9.camel@atropine.boston.devel.redhat.com> <4B903273.90305@garzik.org> <1267743599.1316.47.camel@atropine.boston.devel.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1267743599.1316.47.camel@atropine.boston.devel.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/04/2010 05:59 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 17:21 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > >>> # sed -i 's/\.*/& nouveau.modeset=0/g' /etc/grub.conf >> >> Never tried this part. > > The bug I'm assuming you're referring to is > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519298 > > in which you merely remove the nouveau userspace component, and in which > I can't tell if you built nouveau into the kernel or not, but I assume > you didn't based on your previous post. The X server does only try the > one driver before falling back to vesa, which is a bug in the fallback > logic I suppose. I've (blindly) fixed that for F13 now. Thanks. Can this be put into F12 too? > However, the log in that bug only shows you using the built-in > autoconfig logic, and not an xorg.conf file. So, given you were talking > about a kernel without nouveau, I am left to assume one of: > > - you didn't try writing an xorg.conf fragment > - you did, and it didn't work anyway > > The latter case is entirely plausible, as nv is not the sort of driver > that gets a lot of love, but I'm not aware of any open bugs about gf9800 > in particular in nv. The latter... would modeset in grub interfere, perhaps? Jeff