From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755851Ab0CHWGl (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Mar 2010 17:06:41 -0500 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.152]:27685 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755598Ab0CHWGi (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Mar 2010 17:06:38 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=rlrKA3YIsgQiewQSaS2Go2OXZLG8AjZa7BsTO1vs7Je37m8iQqXPEtF0JMksnGviDh EVtafHrnyYupZlOo3K1D/AiFls/zrP/JA2Q64wGcm0zfO2L78z9e1GxECx+n1WQJpHnv aVNi11naBYjMueYB5p7L4DMHlxdrLbm3pfmDw= Message-ID: <4B9574EB.3080303@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 23:06:35 +0100 From: Jiri Slaby User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; cs-CZ; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100228 SUSE/3.0.3-3.2 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linus Torvalds CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.34-rc1 References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/08/2010 09:33 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > It's out there now. I still have a few trees I already got pull requests > for, and that I want to look over a bit more (ceph, gdb tree etc), and > it's possible that I've just overlooked some other pull request. > > So if you feel like you sent me a pull request bit might have been > over-looked, please point that out to me Hi, yes, the writable limits tree: http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/5/219 Maybe it was ignored on purpose. Either way, I would like to know to decide whether to drop it from -next or not and wait for a 2.6.35 merge window. thanks, -- js