From: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: "Frederic Weisbecker" <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
"Américo Wang" <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: 2.6.33: ftrace triggers soft lockup
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 11:38:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B95C2AF.7010508@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1268101394.10871.1861.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 10:11 +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
>> Steven Rostedt wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 15:32 +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
>
>>> This sounds like the compiler may have screwed up again. Can you compile
>>> with this patch and see if it catches anything?
>>>
>> But I was using a x86_64 machine, and this patch won't do anything on
>> x86_64?
>
> I wonder if this issue has crept to x86_64. What kind of dump do you
> get? And if this segfault is in the kernel, could you see (using gdb on
> a vmlinux) if any of the stack frame setups look peculiar?
>
The segfault is from userspace. This is a segfault I just got:
ftrace_stack_ma[14989]: segfault at fe2e ip 00000000004474c0 sp 00007fffb97e38c0 error 4 in bash[400000+d1000]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-09 3:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-03 6:04 2.6.33: ftrace triggers soft lockup Américo Wang
2010-03-03 13:05 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-04 2:58 ` Américo Wang
2010-03-04 1:33 ` Li Zefan
2010-03-04 1:46 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-04 3:01 ` Américo Wang
2010-03-04 3:18 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-04 4:06 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-04 5:10 ` Américo Wang
2010-03-04 5:18 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-04 13:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-05 4:14 ` Américo Wang
2010-03-05 7:16 ` Américo Wang
2010-03-05 15:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-05 17:16 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-05 18:35 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-05 18:43 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-05 19:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-08 7:32 ` Li Zefan
2010-03-08 15:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-09 2:11 ` Li Zefan
2010-03-09 2:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-09 3:38 ` Li Zefan [this message]
2010-03-12 19:20 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-12 21:38 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-13 2:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-13 5:37 ` Américo Wang
2010-03-13 5:51 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-14 16:55 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-13 17:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-15 1:46 ` Li Zefan
2010-03-15 14:39 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-15 16:16 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-08 2:31 ` Américo Wang
2010-03-09 2:40 ` Américo Wang
2010-03-09 2:51 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-09 5:06 ` Américo Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B95C2AF.7010508@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox