From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754575Ab0CJGI2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Mar 2010 01:08:28 -0500 Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:18647 "EHLO ironport2-out.pppoe.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753247Ab0CJGIZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Mar 2010 01:08:25 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApIBABrGlktLd/sX/2dsb2JhbAAHgwTEJ5BIgTKCXWoEgxc X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,612,1262581200"; d="scan'208";a="57899286" Message-ID: <4B973750.3050103@teksavvy.com> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 01:08:16 -0500 From: Mark Lord User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-GB; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tejun Heo CC: "linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" , lkml , Daniel Taylor , Jeff Garzik , tytso@mit.edu, "H. Peter Anvin" , hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp, Andrew Morton , Alan Cox , irtiger@gmail.com, Matthew Wilcox , aschnell@suse.de, knikanth@suse.de, jdelvare@suse.de Subject: Re: ATA 4 KiB sector issues. References: <4B947393.2050002@kernel.org> <4B965348.3050201@teksavvy.com> <4B96E136.3030001@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <4B96E136.3030001@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/09/10 19:00, Tejun Heo wrote: > On 03/09/2010 10:55 PM, Mark Lord wrote: >> On 03/07/10 22:48, Tejun Heo wrote: >> .. >>> Please note that hdparm is misreporting the alignment offset. It >>> should be reporting 512 instead of 256 for offset-by-one drives. >> .. >> >> That issue was fixed quite a while ago. >> Upgrade your elderly copy of hdparm. > > Heh heh, *you* were keeping it from me! Anyways, is there hdparm > devel tree published somewhere? I wandared the SF page for quite a > bit (which for some reason is very difficult to find things in) but I > couldn't find one. If it's not, it might be a good idea to put it on > SF or git.kernel.org? .. No tree. There's just my working copy (private), and the published versions at SF. But yes, SF has gotten incredibly more cryptic to use of late, and I might have to move it somewhere more accessible soon. Cheers!