public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
To: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-aio@kvack.org, Linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: aio: compat_ioctl issue?
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:13:50 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B994EFE.70005@msgid.tls.msk.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <x49eijqiqcd.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>

Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru> writes:
[]
>> And when running real thing it crashes.   I tested it
>> on 2.6.32 (trivial corrections to the patch required).
> 
> Could you just post your version of the patch so I can have a look?

I think there's no need since in 2.6.33 (where your patch applies
without any offsets) it crashes in exactly the same way:

------
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000008
IP: [<ffffffff810bbf37>] generic_segment_checks+0x17/0xd0
PGD 184f1c067 PUD 184cd1067 PMD 0
Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
last sysfs file: /sys/devices/virtual/input/mice/uevent
CPU 1
Pid: 5182, comm: kvm Not tainted 2.6.33-amd64 #2.6.33.0 M3A78-EM/System Product Name
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff810bbf37>]  [<ffffffff810bbf37>] generic_segment_checks+0x17/0xd0
RSP: 0000:ffff880184d71d30  EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: ffff88018f2eeed8 RBX: ffff880184d71da0 RCX: 0000000000000001
RDX: ffff880184d71dd0 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 0000000000000000
RBP: ffff880184d71dd0 R08: ffffffffffffffea R09: ffff88018f2eef08
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff88018cff3e00 R15: ffff880184c49b00
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff880028280000(0063) knlGS:00000000f6f75b70
CS:  0010 DS: 002b ES: 002b CR0: 000000008005003b
CR2: 0000000000000008 CR3: 0000000184e9b000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Process kvm (pid: 5182, threadinfo ffff880184d70000, task ffff880184d6a080)
Stack:
 ffff88018f2eee80 ffff88018f2eee80 ffffffff810be7a2 ffff880184c90a70
<0> ffff88018f2eeed8 ffff880184c91680 ffff880184c91678 000000000000004f
<0> ffffffff81403680 fffffffe7ffbfeff 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff810be7a2>] ? generic_file_aio_read+0x52/0x620
 [<ffffffff810f3296>] ? cache_alloc_refill+0x96/0x5e0
 [<ffffffff810be750>] ? generic_file_aio_read+0x0/0x620
 [<ffffffff81135634>] ? aio_rw_vect_retry+0x74/0x1f0
 [<ffffffff81136e02>] ? aio_run_iocb+0x82/0x140
 [<ffffffff8113777c>] ? do_io_submit+0x2cc/0x7b0
 [<ffffffff81031412>] ? ia32_sysret+0x0/0x5
Code: 82 40 2c 40 81 c3 66 66 66 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 55 45 31 d2 48 89 d5 53 48 89 f3 48 8b 36 48 85 f6 0f 84 84 00 00 00 <4c> 8b 57 08 4d 85 d2 0f 88 8c 00 00 00 48 8b 07 65 4c 8b 04 25
RIP  [<ffffffff810bbf37>] generic_segment_checks+0x17/0xd0
 RSP <ffff880184d71d30>
CR2: 0000000000000008
---[ end trace 78b5aba2446c4209 ]---

For 2.6.32, the differences were all in fs/aio.c, in 2
places: include file (obvious),

 static int io_submit_one(struct kioctx *ctx, struct iocb __user *user_iocb,
                          struct iocb *iocb, struct hlist_head *batch_hash)

in 2.6.32 it does not have the last 'batch_hash' parameter,
and the only caller of this routine in io_submit() down in
that file.  So the change is trivial and purely mechanical.

But it is not here yet.  I'm trying to dig further...

/mjt

  reply	other threads:[~2010-03-11 20:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-08 21:38 aio: compat_ioctl issue? Michael Tokarev
2010-03-08 21:43 ` Jeff Moyer
2010-03-08 21:50   ` Michael Tokarev
2010-03-08 22:25     ` Jeff Moyer
2010-03-08 22:32       ` Michael Tokarev
2010-03-08 22:41         ` Michael Tokarev
2010-03-11 16:06           ` Jeff Moyer
2010-03-11 19:10             ` Michael Tokarev
2010-03-11 19:13               ` Jeff Moyer
2010-03-11 19:46               ` Michael Tokarev
2010-03-11 19:57                 ` Jeff Moyer
2010-03-11 20:13                   ` Michael Tokarev [this message]
2010-03-16 18:52                     ` Jeff Moyer
2010-03-16 20:36                       ` Michael Tokarev
2010-03-16 20:44                         ` Jeff Moyer
2010-04-28 18:00                           ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-28 18:11                             ` Jeff Moyer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B994EFE.70005@msgid.tls.msk.ru \
    --to=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-aio@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox