From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Sheng Yang <sheng@linux.intel.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
"Yaozu (Eddie) Dong" <eddie.dong@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ian Pratt <Ian.Pratt@eu.citrix.com>,
Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][v9 4/6] xen/hvm: Xen PV extension of HVM initialization
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:35:53 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B9AA5A9.20609@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1268362647-5317-5-git-send-email-sheng@linux.intel.com>
On 03/11/2010 06:57 PM, Sheng Yang wrote:
> The PV extended HVM(once known as Hybrid) is started from real mode like
> HVM guest, but also with a component based PV feature selection(e.g. PV halt,
> PV timer, event channel, then PV drivers). So guest can takes the advantages
> of both H/W virtualization and Para-Virtualization.
>
> This patch introduced the PV extension of HVM guest initialization.
>
> Guest would detect the capability using CPUID 0x40000002.edx, then call
> HVMOP_enable_pv hypercall to enable pv support in hypervisor.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sheng Yang<sheng@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yaozu (Eddie) Dong<eddie.dong@intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/xen/cpuid.h | 5 +
> arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypervisor.h | 12 +++
> arch/x86/xen/Kconfig | 4 +
> arch/x86/xen/Makefile | 1 +
> arch/x86/xen/hvmpv.c | 135 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/xen/interface/hvm/hvm_op.h | 8 ++
> 6 files changed, 165 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/x86/xen/hvmpv.c
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/cpuid.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/cpuid.h
> index 8787f03..b3a0b3a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/cpuid.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/cpuid.h
> @@ -65,4 +65,9 @@
> #define _XEN_CPUID_FEAT1_MMU_PT_UPDATE_PRESERVE_AD 0
> #define XEN_CPUID_FEAT1_MMU_PT_UPDATE_PRESERVE_AD (1u<<0)
>
> +#define _XEN_CPUID_FEAT2_HVM_PV 0
> +#define XEN_CPUID_FEAT2_HVM_PV (1u<<0)
> +#define _XEN_CPUID_FEAT2_HVM_PV_CLOCK 1
> +#define XEN_CPUID_FEAT2_HVM_PV_CLOCK (1u<<1)
> +
> #endif /* __XEN_PUBLIC_ARCH_X86_CPUID_H__ */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypervisor.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypervisor.h
> index d5b7e90..7569f64 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypervisor.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypervisor.h
> @@ -55,6 +55,18 @@ extern enum xen_domain_type xen_domain_type;
> #define xen_hvm_domain() (xen_domain()&& \
> xen_domain_type == XEN_HVM_DOMAIN)
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_XEN_HVM_PV
> +
> +#define XEN_HVM_PV_CLOCK_ENABLED (1u<< 0)
>
Why is this flag needed? As far as I understand it, there's no real
underlying hypervisor change needed to make HVM access to pv clock
possible; its just a field in the shared_info's vcpu struct after all.
Even if you enable this feature unconditionally, the user can still
control whether the Xen clocksource is used with the "clocksource="
kernel command-line parameter.
Also, there's nothing about this which is 64-bit specific is there?
Thanks,
J
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-12 20:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-12 2:57 [PATCH][v9 0/6] PV extension of HVM (Hybrid) for Xen Sheng Yang
2010-03-12 2:57 ` [PATCH][v9 1/6] xen: add support for hvm_op Sheng Yang
2010-03-12 2:57 ` [PATCH][v9 2/6] xen: Import cpuid.h from Xen Sheng Yang
2010-03-12 2:57 ` [PATCH][v9 3/6] xen: Make pv drivers only work with xen_pv_domain() Sheng Yang
2010-03-12 2:57 ` [PATCH][v9 4/6] xen/hvm: Xen PV extension of HVM initialization Sheng Yang
2010-03-12 20:35 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2010-03-15 1:45 ` [Xen-devel] " Sheng Yang
2010-03-15 12:04 ` Stefano Stabellini
2010-03-15 22:59 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-03-16 1:51 ` Sheng Yang
2010-03-16 17:12 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-03-16 17:20 ` Ian Campbell
2010-03-16 17:29 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-03-12 2:57 ` [PATCH][v9 5/6] x86/xen: The entrance for PV extension of HVM Sheng Yang
2010-03-12 2:57 ` [PATCH][v9 6/6] xen: Enable PV clocksource for HVM Sheng Yang
2010-03-12 20:37 ` [Xen-devel] " Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B9AA5A9.20609@goop.org \
--to=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Pratt@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=eddie.dong@intel.com \
--cc=keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sheng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox