From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>,
Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/18][RFC] Nested Paging support for Nested SVM (aka NPT-Virtualization)
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:34:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B9DE2FF.4080909@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100315062721.GA3654@amt.cnet>
On 03/15/2010 08:27 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>>
>>> You should disable out of sync shadow so that l1 guest writes to
>>> l1-nested-ptables always trap.
>>>
>> Why? The guest is under obligation to flush the tlb if it writes to
>> a page table, and we will resync on that tlb flush.
>>
> The guests hypervisor will not flush the tlb with invlpg for updates of
> its NPT pagetables. It'll create a new ASID, and KVM will not trap
> that.
>
We'll get a kvm_set_cr3() on the next vmrun.
>>> And in the trap case, you'd have to
>>> invalidate l2 shadow pagetable entries that used the (now obsolete)
>>> l1-nested-ptable entry. Does that happen automatically?
>>>
>> What do you mean by 'l2 shadow ptable entries'? There are the
>> guest's page tables (ordinary direct mapped, unless the guest's
>> guest is also running an npt-enabled hypervisor), and the host page
>> tables. When the guest writes to each page table, we invalidate the
>> shadows.
>>
> With 'l2 shadow ptable entries' i mean the shadow pagetables that
> translate GPA-L2 -> HPA.
>
kvm_mmu_pte_write() will invalidate those sptes and will also install
new translations if possible.
Beautiful, isn't it?
--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-15 7:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-03 19:12 [PATCH 0/18][RFC] Nested Paging support for Nested SVM (aka NPT-Virtualization) Joerg Roedel
2010-03-03 19:12 ` [PATCH 01/18] KVM: MMU: Check for root_level instead of long mode Joerg Roedel
2010-03-03 19:12 ` [PATCH 02/18] KVM: MMU: Make tdp_enabled a mmu-context parameter Joerg Roedel
2010-03-08 9:17 ` Avi Kivity
2010-03-10 14:44 ` Joerg Roedel
2010-03-10 14:53 ` Avi Kivity
2010-03-10 15:26 ` Joerg Roedel
2010-03-11 6:47 ` Avi Kivity
2010-03-11 10:33 ` Joerg Roedel
2010-03-03 19:12 ` [PATCH 03/18] KVM: MMU: Make set_cr3 a function pointer in kvm_mmu Joerg Roedel
2010-03-03 19:12 ` [PATCH 04/18] KVM: X86: Introduce a tdp_set_cr3 function Joerg Roedel
2010-03-03 19:12 ` [PATCH 05/18] KVM: MMU: Introduce get_cr3 function pointer Joerg Roedel
2010-03-03 19:12 ` [PATCH 06/18] KVM: MMU: Introduce inject_page_fault " Joerg Roedel
2010-03-03 19:12 ` [PATCH 07/18] KVM: SVM: Implement MMU helper functions for Nested Nested Paging Joerg Roedel
2010-03-03 19:12 ` [PATCH 08/18] KVM: MMU: Change init_kvm_softmmu to take a context as parameter Joerg Roedel
2010-03-03 19:12 ` [PATCH 09/18] KVM: MMU: Let is_rsvd_bits_set take mmu context instead of vcpu Joerg Roedel
2010-03-03 19:12 ` [PATCH 10/18] KVM: MMU: Introduce generic walk_addr function Joerg Roedel
2010-03-03 19:12 ` [PATCH 11/18] KVM: MMU: Add infrastructure for two-level page walker Joerg Roedel
2010-03-08 9:37 ` Avi Kivity
2010-03-10 14:46 ` Joerg Roedel
2010-03-03 19:12 ` [PATCH 12/18] KVM: MMU: Implement nested gva_to_gpa functions Joerg Roedel
2010-03-03 19:12 ` [PATCH 13/18] KVM: MMU: Introduce Nested MMU context Joerg Roedel
2010-03-03 19:12 ` [PATCH 14/18] KVM: SVM: Initialize Nested Nested MMU context on VMRUN Joerg Roedel
2010-03-03 19:12 ` [PATCH 15/18] KVM: MMU: Propagate the right fault back to the guest after gva_to_gpa Joerg Roedel
2010-03-15 4:30 ` Daniel K.
2010-03-15 12:52 ` Joerg Roedel
2010-03-15 7:36 ` Avi Kivity
2010-03-15 9:06 ` Joerg Roedel
2010-03-15 9:23 ` Avi Kivity
2010-03-15 9:41 ` Joerg Roedel
2010-03-03 19:12 ` [PATCH 16/18] KVM: X86: Add callback to let modules decide over some supported cpuid bits Joerg Roedel
2010-03-03 19:12 ` [PATCH 17/18] KVM: SVM: Report Nested Paging support to userspace Joerg Roedel
2010-03-03 23:37 ` Alexander Graf
2010-03-04 11:27 ` Joerg Roedel
2010-03-03 19:12 ` [PATCH 18/18] KVM: X86: Add KVM_CAP_SVM_CPUID_FIXED Joerg Roedel
2010-03-08 9:39 ` Avi Kivity
2010-03-10 14:46 ` Joerg Roedel
2010-03-03 23:10 ` [PATCH 0/18][RFC] Nested Paging support for Nested SVM (aka NPT-Virtualization) Jan Kiszka
2010-03-03 23:44 ` Alexander Graf
2010-03-04 11:29 ` Joerg Roedel
2010-03-04 0:35 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-03-04 14:42 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-03-04 15:58 ` Joerg Roedel
2010-03-11 20:58 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-03-12 7:36 ` Avi Kivity
2010-03-15 6:27 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-03-15 7:34 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2010-03-12 7:41 ` Avi Kivity
2010-03-08 9:41 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B9DE2FF.4080909@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox