From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965376Ab0COQU1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Mar 2010 12:20:27 -0400 Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:46566 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965346Ab0COQUX (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Mar 2010 12:20:23 -0400 Message-ID: <4B9E5E43.9060206@trash.net> Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:20:19 +0100 From: Patrick McHardy User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090701) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joe Perches CC: Wensong Zhang , Simon Horman , Julian Anastasov , "David S. Miller" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, lvs-devel , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ftp.c: Remove use of NIPQUAD References: <1268094699.1617.5.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> In-Reply-To: <1268094699.1617.5.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Joe Perches wrote: > NIPQUAD has very few uses left. > > Remove this use and make the code have the identical form of the only > other use of "%u,%u,%u,%u,%u,%u" in net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_ftp.c Are we trying to remove NIPQUAD? In my opinion the current code is preferrable to open-coding NIPQUAD.