From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965629Ab0COWQr (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Mar 2010 18:16:47 -0400 Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:50592 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964968Ab0COWQq (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Mar 2010 18:16:46 -0400 Message-ID: <4B9EB185.3010400@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:15:33 -0700 From: Yinghai Lu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100228 SUSE/3.0.3-1.1.1 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Suresh Siddha CC: Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , LKML , "Eric W. Biederman" Subject: Re: [patch] x86: handle legacy PIC interrupts on all the cpu's References: <1268692386.3296.43.camel@sbs-t61.sc.intel.com> <4B9EABE8.1020203@kernel.org> <1268693771.3296.49.camel@sbs-t61.sc.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <1268693771.3296.49.camel@sbs-t61.sc.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/15/2010 03:56 PM, Suresh Siddha wrote: > On Mon, 2010-03-15 at 14:51 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: >>> + for (irq = 0; irq < legacy_pic->nr_legacy_irqs; irq++) >>> + if (!IO_APIC_IRQ(irq)) >>> + per_cpu(vector_irq, cpu)[IRQ0_VECTOR + irq] = irq; >> >> seems those three lines are not needed... > > Those are needed for !CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC case. > then we can have +#ifndef CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC + for (irq = 0; irq < legacy_pic->nr_legacy_irqs; irq++) + per_cpu(vector_irq, cpu)[IRQ0_VECTOR + irq] = irq; +#endif then we don't punish most setup with ioapic controller. Yinghai