From: Albert Herranz <albert_herranz@yahoo.es>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/11] swiotlb: support NOT_COHERENT_CACHE PowerPC platforms
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 07:17:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B9F228A.8030005@yahoo.es> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100316112444D.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> If we want to make swiotlb generic (make on any architectures), we
> need to handle more cache issues here, I think. So it's better to have
> more generic ways instead of adding hooks to some archs.
>
Ok. So what would be an acceptable way of handling this in a generic way?
Should we for example have 2 levels of DMA ops in the swiotlb case (swiotlb and "actual") and call the 2nd level ("actual") from the swiotlb code whenever we need to act on non-bounced buffers?
Any other ideas?
Thanks,
Albert
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-16 6:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1268421166-4791-1-git-send-email-albert_herranz@yahoo.es>
2010-03-12 19:12 ` [PATCH v4 03/11] swiotbl: add back swiotlb_alloc_boot() Albert Herranz
2010-03-12 19:12 ` [PATCH v4 04/11] swiotlb: support NOT_COHERENT_CACHE PowerPC platforms Albert Herranz
2010-03-16 1:54 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2010-03-16 2:25 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2010-03-16 6:17 ` Albert Herranz [this message]
2010-03-16 6:09 ` Albert Herranz
2010-03-12 19:12 ` [PATCH v4 05/11] swiotlb: add swiotlb_set_default_size() Albert Herranz
2010-03-16 1:44 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2010-03-16 5:58 ` Albert Herranz
2010-03-16 10:08 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2010-03-16 19:28 ` Becky Bruce
2010-03-16 23:16 ` FUJITA Tomonori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B9F228A.8030005@yahoo.es \
--to=albert_herranz@yahoo.es \
--cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox