From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S937960Ab0CPR31 (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:29:27 -0400 Received: from claw.goop.org ([74.207.240.146]:54317 "EHLO claw.goop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759919Ab0CPR30 (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:29:26 -0400 Message-ID: <4B9FBFF3.4090806@goop.org> Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:29:23 -0700 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100301 Fedora/3.0.3-1.fc12 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ian Campbell CC: Sheng Yang , Stefano Stabellini , xen-devel , "Yaozu (Eddie) Dong" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Ian Pratt , Keir Fraser Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][v9 4/6] xen/hvm: Xen PV extension of HVM initialization References: <1268362647-5317-1-git-send-email-sheng@linux.intel.com> <4B9EBBEE.9020107@goop.org> <201003160951.48973.sheng@linux.intel.com> <4B9FBBEA.2060508@goop.org> <1268760010.10129.31253.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> In-Reply-To: <1268760010.10129.31253.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/16/2010 10:20 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: > I don't think a new hypercall is required. Xen should simply pre-account > for the TSC offset which HVM guests are subject to in > __update_vcpu_system_time. > Yes, that would work too. J