From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752148Ab0CQCCK (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:02:10 -0400 Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([222.73.24.84]:54696 "EHLO song.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751973Ab0CQCCI (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:02:08 -0400 Message-ID: <4BA03859.4060300@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 10:03:05 +0800 From: Li Zefan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090513 Fedora/3.0-2.3.beta2.fc11 Thunderbird/3.0b2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Rothwell CC: Jens Axboe , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ben Blum Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with Linus' tree References: <20100317125200.5deb72ba.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20100317125200.5deb72ba.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Jens, > > Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in > block/Kconfig between commit 67523c48aa74d5637848edeccf285af1c60bf14a > ("cgroups: blkio subsystem as module") from Linus' tree and commit > 910ac735bad53ce54741a72a5b19ab69794ae069 ("block: make CONFIG_BLK_CGROUP > visible") from the block tree. > > I used the block tree version. The merge is correct, thanks!