From: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: fweisbec@gmail.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, tj@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] percpu misaligned allocation
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:39:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BA1CA91.2060004@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100317.232648.59697287.davem@davemloft.net>
David Miller wrote:
> From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 05:49:33 +0100
>
>> While using the lock events through perf in a sparc box, I can see
>> the following message repeated many times:
>>
>> Kernel unaligned access at TPC[49357c] perf_trace_lock_acquire+0xb4/0x180
>>
>> It actually hangs the box as the messages are sent to a serial console.
>>
>> When used with perf, the trace events use a per cpu buffer allocated
>> in kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c, and the allocation appears to return
>> a misaligned percpu pointer. It is aligned to 4 while it seems it
>> requires to be aligned to 8.
>
> Thanks I'll take a look at this.
>
> RAW locks (both rwlocks and spinlocks) on sparc64 are 4-bytes
> in size, maybe some piece of code is assuming that locks
> are cpu word sized.
>
> Where is perf_trace_lock_acquire() I can't find it in Linus's
> tree? Does it get created by some crazy macro expansion?
>
Yes, it's expanded by some crazy macro in include/trace/ftrace.h..
In linus' tree, it's called ftrace_profile_lock_acquire(), and it's
renamed to perf_trace_lock_acquire() in -tip tree by commit
97d5a22005f38057b4bc0d95f81cd26510268794.
#undef DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS
#define DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(call, proto, args, tstruct, assign, print) \
static notrace void \
ftrace_profile_templ_##call(struct ftrace_event_call *event_call, \
proto) \
{ \
struct ftrace_data_offsets_##call __maybe_unused __data_offsets;\
struct ftrace_raw_##call *entry; \
u64 __addr = 0, __count = 1; \
unsigned long irq_flags; \
int __entry_size; \
int __data_size; \
int rctx; \
\
...
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-18 6:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-18 4:49 [BUG] percpu misaligned allocation Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-18 6:26 ` David Miller
2010-03-18 6:28 ` David Miller
2010-03-18 6:36 ` Li Zefan
2010-03-18 6:39 ` Li Zefan [this message]
2010-03-18 16:56 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-18 9:30 ` Tejun Heo
2010-03-18 19:50 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-19 0:54 ` David Miller
2010-03-19 1:31 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-19 1:51 ` Tejun Heo
2010-03-19 1:57 ` David Miller
2010-03-19 2:18 ` Tejun Heo
2010-03-19 2:30 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-19 3:02 ` David Miller
2010-03-19 15:48 ` Richard Kennedy
2010-03-24 20:54 ` Maciej Rutecki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BA1CA91.2060004@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox