From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751900Ab0CRQHy (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Mar 2010 12:07:54 -0400 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.10]:60560 "EHLO mail-out.m-online.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750960Ab0CRQHx (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Mar 2010 12:07:53 -0400 X-Auth-Info: 9sbv9s97qhn6pBtlXphEl+9lpSVFcJ7qnkMscyIhrM8= Message-ID: <4BA24F77.6010209@grandegger.com> Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:06:15 +0100 From: Wolfgang Grandegger User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Ira W. Snyder" CC: socketcan-core@lists.berlios.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] can: add support for Janz VMOD-ICAN3 Intelligent CAN module References: <1267564929-9324-1-git-send-email-iws@ovro.caltech.edu> <1267564929-9324-3-git-send-email-iws@ovro.caltech.edu> <20100317193312.GF9783@ovro.caltech.edu> <4BA1E609.1010401@grandegger.com> <20100318151913.GA11682@ovro.caltech.edu> In-Reply-To: <20100318151913.GA11682@ovro.caltech.edu> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ira W. Snyder wrote: > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 09:36:25AM +0100, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: >> Hi Ira, >> >> Ira W. Snyder wrote: >>> Hello SocketCAN folks, >>> >>> Is there any feedback on this patch? I've waited two weeks without a >>> response to any part of the series. As this is the biggest patch in the >>> series, if you're fine with it, I think the other supporting patches >>> should be fairly uncontroversial. >> For some strange reason this patch did not show up in my socketcan mbox, >> sorry. At least I cannot find it. Oliver, or somebody else, did you >> receive it? Nevertheless, for kernel inclusion the patch should go >> through the netdev mailing list as described in: >> >> http://svn.berlios.de/svnroot/repos/socketcan/trunk/README.submitting-patches >> >> It's also confusing that one 2/3 shows up on the Socketcan-core ML. At >> least 0/3 should also be presented there. >> >> Could you please resubmit? >> > > Sure, I'll resubmit. > > The patch showed up just fine on socketcan-core for me (I'm subscribed). It seems to be a local problem then :-). > It also showed up on LKML (I'm not subscribed). I'll make sure to CC I'm not subscribed either. > everyone with patch 0/3, as well as CC'ing netdev. Thanks, Wolfgang.