From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753666Ab0CRSKw (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:10:52 -0400 Received: from mail-pz0-f200.google.com ([209.85.222.200]:57888 "EHLO mail-pz0-f200.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753210Ab0CRSKu (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:10:50 -0400 Message-ID: <4BA26CA2.6000505@codemonkey.ws> Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:10:42 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091209 Fedora/3.0-4.fc12 Lightning/1.0pre Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ingo Molnar CC: Jes Sorensen , Avi Kivity , "Zhang, Yanmin" , Peter Zijlstra , Sheng Yang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Marcelo Tosatti , oerg Roedel , Gleb Natapov , Zachary Amsden , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Fr?d?ric Weisbecker Subject: Re: [RFC] Unify KVM kernel-space and user-space code into a single project References: <20100316173940.GA23859@elte.hu> <4BA00F1F.1090907@codemonkey.ws> <20100317081041.GC16374@elte.hu> <4BA1E7E2.3010803@redhat.com> <20100318095418.GD2157@elte.hu> <4BA2030B.3090007@redhat.com> <20100318105826.GA2174@elte.hu> <4BA2296A.90401@redhat.com> <20100318142255.GG25642@elte.hu> <4BA23CA5.20801@redhat.com> <20100318165435.GA9756@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20100318165435.GA9756@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/18/2010 11:54 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > I took a quick look at the qemu.git log and more than half of all recent > contributions came from Linux distributors. > I don't know what you're looking at, but in the past month, there's been 56 unique contributors, with 411 changesets. I count 16 people employed by distributions with 188 changesets. > So without KVM Qemu would be a much, much smaller project. It would be similar > to how it was 5 years ago. > I'm not saying that KVM isn't significant. I'm employed to work on QEMU because of KVM. I'm just saying that KVM users aren't 99% of the community and that we can't neglect the rest of the community. Regards, Anthony Liguori