public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>,
	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irq: Start the transition of irq_chip methods taking a desc
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 11:50:34 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BA66A7A.3070207@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1003211541120.3147@localhost.localdomain>

On 03/21/2010 07:43 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Eric,
> 
> On Sun, 21 Mar 2010, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>
>> With SPARSE_IRQ irq_to_desc becomes an unnecessary lookup operation on
>> the fast path of dispatching irqs to their handlers.  We can avoid
>> this cost by passing an irq_desc pointer instead of using an integer
>> irq token to the irq_chip methods.
>>
>> A single patch to convert all of the architectures is an unreviewable
>> 2000+ line patch.  A gradual transition scenario with two sets of
>> irq_chip methods in irq_chip is an unmanageable mess in kernel/irq.
>>
>> So instead I define some macros so the generic irq code in kernel/irq/
>> can compile either way based on a boolean Kconfig variable
>> CONFIG_CHIP_PARAM_DESC.  This allows us to convert one architecture at
>> a time, reducing the follow on patches to manageable proportions.  It
>> is a little bit ugly but it is much better than the alternatives, and
>> as soon as we finish the transition we can kill the macros.
>>
>> I introduce the macros CHIP_ARG, CHIP_VAR, and CHIP_PARAM where
>> appropriate.  I change a few declarations of irq as int to unsigned
>> int.  I normalize the variables names in the functions that call
>> chip methods to ensure that I have the variables irq and desc present
>> allowing CHIP_ARG to work properly.  Most importantly none of the irq
>> logic changes with this patch.
> 
> I like that approach very much. Is the output binary equivivalent?
> 
great.

will update x86 part and related core according to this, and give it a try.

YH

  reply	other threads:[~2010-03-21 18:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-04 10:08 [PATCH 0/12] irq related: make function to take irq_desc pointer instead of irq Yinghai Lu
2010-03-04 10:08 ` [PATCH 01/12] x86: fix out of order of gsi - full Yinghai Lu
2010-03-04 10:08 ` [PATCH 02/12] x86: set nr_irqs_gsi only in probe_nr_irqs_gsi Yinghai Lu
2010-03-04 10:08 ` [PATCH 03/12] x86: kill smpboot_hooks.h Yinghai Lu
2010-03-04 10:08 ` [PATCH 04/12] x86: use vector_desc instead of vector_irq Yinghai Lu
2010-03-04 10:08 ` [PATCH 05/12] genericirq: make irq_chip to have member with irq_desc pointer Yinghai Lu
2010-03-04 10:08 ` [PATCH 06/12] genericirq: make irq_chip related function to take desc Yinghai Lu
2010-03-04 14:31   ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-03-04 18:56     ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-04 19:08       ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-03-04 19:20         ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-05  7:47       ` Julia Lawall
2010-03-21  4:18         ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-03-21 11:03           ` Julia Lawall
2010-03-21 13:11             ` [PATCH] irq: Start the transition of irq_chip methods taking a desc Eric W. Biederman
2010-03-21 14:43               ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-03-21 18:50                 ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2010-03-22  0:32                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-03-21 13:49             ` [PATCH 06/12] genericirq: make irq_chip related function to take desc Eric W. Biederman
2010-03-21 14:19               ` Julia Lawall
2010-03-21 16:29               ` Julia Lawall
2010-03-21 11:08           ` Julia Lawall
2010-03-21 11:43             ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-03-21 19:16           ` Julia Lawall
2010-03-21 19:35           ` Julia Lawall
2010-03-21 19:36           ` Julia Lawall
2010-03-22  0:36             ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-03-04 19:18     ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-04 10:08 ` [PATCH 07/12] genericirq: make hpet_msi/ht/msi/dmar_msi " Yinghai Lu
2010-03-04 10:08 ` [PATCH 08/12] x86: make irq_chip to use desc_mask instead of mask Yinghai Lu
2010-03-04 15:10   ` [PATCH 08/12] x86: make irq_chip to use desc_mask instead of maskn Thomas Gleixner
2010-03-04 10:08 ` [PATCH 09/12] x86: irq_chip to use desc_mask instead of mask part 2 Yinghai Lu
2010-03-04 10:08 ` [PATCH 10/12] genericirq: add set_irq_desc_chip/data Yinghai Lu
2010-03-04 10:08 ` [PATCH 11/12] x86/iommu/dmar: update iommu/inter_remapping to use desc Yinghai Lu
2010-03-04 10:08 ` [PATCH 12/12] x86: remove arch_probe_nr_irqs Yinghai Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4BA66A7A.3070207@kernel.org \
    --to=yinghai@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=julia@diku.dk \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox