From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irq: Start the transition of irq_chip methods taking a desc
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 11:50:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BA66A7A.3070207@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1003211541120.3147@localhost.localdomain>
On 03/21/2010 07:43 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Eric,
>
> On Sun, 21 Mar 2010, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>
>> With SPARSE_IRQ irq_to_desc becomes an unnecessary lookup operation on
>> the fast path of dispatching irqs to their handlers. We can avoid
>> this cost by passing an irq_desc pointer instead of using an integer
>> irq token to the irq_chip methods.
>>
>> A single patch to convert all of the architectures is an unreviewable
>> 2000+ line patch. A gradual transition scenario with two sets of
>> irq_chip methods in irq_chip is an unmanageable mess in kernel/irq.
>>
>> So instead I define some macros so the generic irq code in kernel/irq/
>> can compile either way based on a boolean Kconfig variable
>> CONFIG_CHIP_PARAM_DESC. This allows us to convert one architecture at
>> a time, reducing the follow on patches to manageable proportions. It
>> is a little bit ugly but it is much better than the alternatives, and
>> as soon as we finish the transition we can kill the macros.
>>
>> I introduce the macros CHIP_ARG, CHIP_VAR, and CHIP_PARAM where
>> appropriate. I change a few declarations of irq as int to unsigned
>> int. I normalize the variables names in the functions that call
>> chip methods to ensure that I have the variables irq and desc present
>> allowing CHIP_ARG to work properly. Most importantly none of the irq
>> logic changes with this patch.
>
> I like that approach very much. Is the output binary equivivalent?
>
great.
will update x86 part and related core according to this, and give it a try.
YH
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-21 18:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-04 10:08 [PATCH 0/12] irq related: make function to take irq_desc pointer instead of irq Yinghai Lu
2010-03-04 10:08 ` [PATCH 01/12] x86: fix out of order of gsi - full Yinghai Lu
2010-03-04 10:08 ` [PATCH 02/12] x86: set nr_irqs_gsi only in probe_nr_irqs_gsi Yinghai Lu
2010-03-04 10:08 ` [PATCH 03/12] x86: kill smpboot_hooks.h Yinghai Lu
2010-03-04 10:08 ` [PATCH 04/12] x86: use vector_desc instead of vector_irq Yinghai Lu
2010-03-04 10:08 ` [PATCH 05/12] genericirq: make irq_chip to have member with irq_desc pointer Yinghai Lu
2010-03-04 10:08 ` [PATCH 06/12] genericirq: make irq_chip related function to take desc Yinghai Lu
2010-03-04 14:31 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-03-04 18:56 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-04 19:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-03-04 19:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-05 7:47 ` Julia Lawall
2010-03-21 4:18 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-03-21 11:03 ` Julia Lawall
2010-03-21 13:11 ` [PATCH] irq: Start the transition of irq_chip methods taking a desc Eric W. Biederman
2010-03-21 14:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-03-21 18:50 ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2010-03-22 0:32 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-03-21 13:49 ` [PATCH 06/12] genericirq: make irq_chip related function to take desc Eric W. Biederman
2010-03-21 14:19 ` Julia Lawall
2010-03-21 16:29 ` Julia Lawall
2010-03-21 11:08 ` Julia Lawall
2010-03-21 11:43 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-03-21 19:16 ` Julia Lawall
2010-03-21 19:35 ` Julia Lawall
2010-03-21 19:36 ` Julia Lawall
2010-03-22 0:36 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-03-04 19:18 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-04 10:08 ` [PATCH 07/12] genericirq: make hpet_msi/ht/msi/dmar_msi " Yinghai Lu
2010-03-04 10:08 ` [PATCH 08/12] x86: make irq_chip to use desc_mask instead of mask Yinghai Lu
2010-03-04 15:10 ` [PATCH 08/12] x86: make irq_chip to use desc_mask instead of maskn Thomas Gleixner
2010-03-04 10:08 ` [PATCH 09/12] x86: irq_chip to use desc_mask instead of mask part 2 Yinghai Lu
2010-03-04 10:08 ` [PATCH 10/12] genericirq: add set_irq_desc_chip/data Yinghai Lu
2010-03-04 10:08 ` [PATCH 11/12] x86/iommu/dmar: update iommu/inter_remapping to use desc Yinghai Lu
2010-03-04 10:08 ` [PATCH 12/12] x86: remove arch_probe_nr_irqs Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BA66A7A.3070207@kernel.org \
--to=yinghai@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=julia@diku.dk \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox