From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755430Ab0CVRcy (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:32:54 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:13926 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750905Ab0CVRcw (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:32:52 -0400 Message-ID: <4BA7A9AF.3010806@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 19:32:31 +0200 From: Avi Kivity User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100301 Fedora/3.0.3-1.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pekka Enberg CC: "Frank Ch. Eigler" , Ingo Molnar , Joerg Roedel , Anthony Liguori , "Zhang, Yanmin" , Peter Zijlstra , Sheng Yang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Marcelo Tosatti , Jes Sorensen , Gleb Natapov , Zachary Amsden , ziteng.huang@intel.com, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Fr?d?ric Weisbecker Subject: Re: [RFC] Unify KVM kernel-space and user-space code into a single project References: <20100318172805.GB26067@elte.hu> <4BA3747F.60401@codemonkey.ws> <20100321191742.GD25922@elte.hu> <4BA67B2F.4030101@redhat.com> <20100321203121.GA30194@elte.hu> <20100322111040.GL13108@8bytes.org> <20100322122228.GH3483@elte.hu> <20100322134633.GD1940@8bytes.org> <20100322163215.GC18796@elte.hu> <84144f021003221027t1a3e7d6ft64612654c5e50da@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <84144f021003221027t1a3e7d6ft64612654c5e50da@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/22/2010 07:27 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote: > It's kinda funny to see people argue that having an external > repository is not a problem and that it's not a big deal if building > something from the repository is slightly painful as long as it > doesn't require a PhD when we have _real world_ experience that it > _does_ limit developer base in some cases. Whether or not that applies > to kvm remains to be seen but I've yet to see a convincing argument > why it doesn't. > qemu has non-Linux developers. Not all of their contributions are relevant to kvm but some are. If we pull qemu into tools/kvm, we lose them. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function