Re: [PATCH 2/3] can: add support for Janz VMOD-ICAN3 Intelligent CAN module

[Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>]

Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Ira W. Snyder wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 08:55:16AM +0100, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>>> Ira W. Snyder wrote:
> [snip]
>>>> Does this seem right? It seems pretty good to me.
>>> Yes, I'm just missing an error-passive message. What state does "ip -d
>>> link show can0" report.
>>>
>> Ok, here is what I did:
>>
>> $ ip link set can0 up type can bitrate 1000000
>> $ ip link set can1 up type can bitrate 1000000 berr-reporting on
>> $ ip -d -s link
>> 5: can0: <NOARP,UP,LOWER_UP,ECHO> mtu 16 qdisc pfifo_fast state UNKNOWN qlen 10
>>     link/can       
>>     can state ERROR-ACTIVE (berr-counter tx 0 rx 0) restart-ms 0
>>     bitrate 1000000 sample-point 0.750
>>     tq 125 prop-seg 2 phase-seg1 3 phase-seg2 2 sjw 1
>>     janz-ican3: tseg1 1..16 tseg2 1..8 sjw 1..4 brp 1..64 brp-inc 1
>>     clock 8000000  
>>     re-started bus-errors arbit-lost error-warn error-pass bus-off
>>     0          0          0          0          0          0
>>     RX: bytes  packets  errors  dropped overrun mcast
>>     0          0        0       0       0       0
>>     TX: bytes  packets  errors  dropped carrier collsns
>>     0          0        0       0       0       0
>> 6: can1: <NOARP,UP,LOWER_UP,ECHO> mtu 16 qdisc pfifo_fast state UNKNOWN qlen 10
>>     link/can       
>>     can <BERR-REPORTING> state ERROR-ACTIVE (berr-counter tx 0 rx 0) restart-ms 0
>>     bitrate 1000000 sample-point 0.750
>>     tq 125 prop-seg 2 phase-seg1 3 phase-seg2 2 sjw 1
>>     janz-ican3: tseg1 1..16 tseg2 1..8 sjw 1..4 brp 1..64 brp-inc 1
>>     clock 8000000  
>>     re-started bus-errors arbit-lost error-warn error-pass bus-off
>>     0          0          0          0          0          0
>>     RX: bytes  packets  errors  dropped overrun mcast
>>     0          0        0       0       0       0
>>     TX: bytes  packets  errors  dropped carrier collsns
>>     0          0        0       0       0       0
>>
>> Now, in seperate windows, I ran cansequence and candump. I stopped
>> cansequence when it could not send any more packets (due to the cable
>> being unplugged).
>>
>> $ cansequence -v -e -p can0
>> $ cansequence -v -e -p can1
>> $ candump any,0~0,#FFFFFFFF
>>   can0  20000004  [8] 00 08 00 00 00 00 00 00   ERRORFRAME
>>   can1  20000088  [8] 00 00 80 19 00 00 00 00   ERRORFRAME
>>   can1  20000088  [8] 00 00 80 19 00 00 00 00   ERRORFRAME
>>   can1  20000088  [8] 00 00 80 19 00 00 00 00   ERRORFRAME
>>   can1  20000088  [8] 00 00 80 19 00 00 00 00   ERRORFRAME
>>   can1  20000088  [8] 00 00 80 19 00 00 00 00   ERRORFRAME
>>   can1  20000088  [8] 00 00 80 19 00 00 00 00   ERRORFRAME
>>   can1  20000088  [8] 00 00 80 19 00 00 00 00   ERRORFRAME
>>   can1  20000088  [8] 00 00 80 19 00 00 00 00   ERRORFRAME
>>   can1  20000088  [8] 00 00 80 19 00 00 00 00   ERRORFRAME
>>   can1  20000088  [8] 00 00 80 19 00 00 00 00   ERRORFRAME
>>   can1  20000088  [8] 00 00 80 19 00 00 00 00   ERRORFRAME
>>   can1  20000004  [8] 00 08 00 00 00 00 00 00   ERRORFRAME
>>   can1  20000088  [8] 00 00 80 19 00 00 00 00   ERRORFRAME
>>   can1  20000088  [8] 00 00 80 19 00 00 00 00   ERRORFRAME
>>   can1  20000088  [8] 00 00 80 19 00 00 00 00   ERRORFRAME
>>   can1  20000088  [8] 00 00 80 19 00 00 00 00   ERRORFRAME
>>
>> This last message is repeated lots more times. That's the flooding we're
>> avoiding with berr-reporting off.
>>
>> I see two types of messages here:
>> 1) bus error (only on can1)
>> 2) controller problems -- tx warning limit reached (both)
>>
>> Am I missing some message? My error frame generation was mostly copied
>> from the sja1000 driver.
> 
> It seem that you are not getting the error passive interrupt even...

Because you do not enable/handle it. CEVTIND_EPI seems to be missing:

http://lxr.linux.no/#linux+v2.6.33/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000.c#L403

Wolfgang.