From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: sched_wakeup_new and sched_kthread_stop events cause great overload
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:36:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BAB2EAF.2030804@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
We have done sysbench test for ftrace's performance and it looks sched_wakeup_new
and sched_kthread_stop events can cause great overload.
When we only enable sched_wakeup_new and sched_kthread_stop events, sysbench.threads
shows the overload is 10%, sysbench.mutex shows the overload is 7.5%.
The more weird thing is that we found the sched_kthread_stop event is never called
in this test, the test steps as follow:
echo > debugfs/tracing/set_event
echo 1 > debugfs/tracing/events/sched/sched_wakeup_new/enable
echo 1 > debugfs/tracing/events/sched/sched_kthread_stop/enable
com_opt="--num-threads=5000 --max-requests=50000"
echo > debugfs/tracing/trace
sysbench $com_opt --test=threads --thread-yields=1000 --thread-locks=10000 run >& log
[or sysbench $com_opt --test=mutex --mutex-num=100 --mutex-locks=50000 --mutex-loops=10000 run for mutex]
echo > debugfs/tracing/set_event
For sysbench.threads:
cat debugfs/tracing/trace | grep "sched_wakeup_new" | wc -l
5001
cat debugfs/tracing/trace | grep "sched_kthread_stop" | wc -l
0
For sysbench.mutex:
cat debugfs/tracing/trace | grep "sched_wakeup_new" | wc -l
5001
cat debugfs/tracing/trace | grep "sched_kthread_stop" | wc -l
0
And, if only enable sched_kthread_stop event, the sysbench.threads's
overload is 5.90%, the sysbench.mutex's overload is 3.36%.
It hardly explain why sched_kthread_stop is never called but cause great overload.
next reply other threads:[~2010-03-25 9:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-25 9:36 Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2010-03-25 13:35 ` sched_wakeup_new and sched_kthread_stop events cause great overload Steven Rostedt
2010-04-01 9:37 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-04-01 16:53 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BAB2EAF.2030804@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox